Regional cerebral blood flow trends in head injured patients with focal contusions and cerebral edema.

Focal contusions following head injury may be associated with focal or diffuse cerebral edema. Early global hyperemia and perifocal hyperemia may play a role in cerebral edema, although causal relationships have yet to be clearly been defined. We studied 27 patients with head injury (admission GCS 3-12) resulting in focal contusions (without evidence of subarachnoid, intraventricular or intraparenchymal hemorrhage by CT). Patients were studied with ICP monitors, head CTs, and intravenous 133Xenon regional cerebral perfusion studies serially over several days post injury. Low cortical blood flow and a low mean CBF15 flow were evident on the day of the injury. Additionally, F1 analysis indicated significantly (p < 0.05) greater cortical blood flow in the surrounding brain (mean 60 cc/100 g/min) compared to the contusion area (mean 43 cc/100 g/min) on the day of trauma. Mean regional CBF remained below normal in the contused areas (CBF15 < 35 cc/100 g/min), however the cortical flow increased in the first few days post-injury (peak F1 = 95 cc/100 g/min on day 3) then decreased to sub-normal levels. The mean CBF in the surrounding brain was low on the day of injury (CBF15 = 29 cc/100 g/min), although higher than the contused area, and increased to a peak of 45 cc/1009/min on day 3 posttrauma. Cortical flow in the surrounding brain, however, exhibited a different trend. The mean F1 was low on the day of trauma and significantly higher one day after trauma (mean 105 cc/100 g/min). Only 15 of the 27 patients with focal contusions had evidence of cerebral edema. Eleven of these exhibited focal edema and 4 exhibited diffuse edema. Focal edema developed over the first few days posttrauma as seen in followup CT, whereas patients with diffuse edema exhibited edema on the admission CT. Initial oligemia in the contused areas was associated with a subsequent hyperemic rim about the contusion. Focal hyperemia was associated with focal edema in 41% of the patients, whereas diffuse edema appeared to be independent of the hyperemic response in contusions.