Suppr超能文献

病态窦房结综合征患者植入永久性起搏器后的长期生存情况。

Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome.

作者信息

Tung R T, Shen W K, Hayes D L, Hammill S C, Bailey K R, Gersh B J

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15;74(10):1016-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90851-6.

Abstract

In this population-based study, long-term survival and prognostic factors were examined in 148 patients, 55 men and 93 women, from Olmsted County, Minnesota, who had permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome between 1969 and 1991. The overall survival for patients who had received a permanent pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome was significantly worse than that of an age- and sex-matched control population (p < 0.0001). The increased mortality was attributable at least in part to the presence of structural heart disease in patients with sick sinus syndrome who had undergone permanent pacemaker implantation (82 of 148 patients, 55%). Survival of patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome was comparable (p = 0.6729), whereas in patients with structural heart disease it was significantly worse than expected (p < 0.0001). Symptoms were eliminated or improved in 116 patients (78%) after pacemaker implantation. Multivariate analysis identified congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and age as independent risk factors for mortality. However, there was a trend toward decreased survival in patients who had received ventricular pacing compared with those who had received dual-chamber pacing, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0556). The mode of pacing was not an independent risk factor (p = 0.23). The observed survival of patients aged < 80 years was significantly worse than expected (p < 0.0001), whereas that of patients aged > or = 80 years was similar to the expected (p = 0.22).

摘要

在这项基于人群的研究中,对明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县148例患者(55例男性和93例女性)进行了长期生存情况及预后因素的研究,这些患者于1969年至1991年间因病态窦房结综合征接受了永久性起搏器植入。接受永久性起搏器治疗病态窦房结综合征患者的总体生存率显著低于年龄和性别匹配的对照人群(p<0.0001)。死亡率增加至少部分归因于接受永久性起搏器植入的病态窦房结综合征患者存在结构性心脏病(148例患者中的82例,55%)。孤立性病态窦房结综合征患者的生存率相当(p = 0.6729),而存在结构性心脏病的患者生存率显著低于预期(p<0.0001)。116例患者(78%)在起搏器植入后症状得到消除或改善。多因素分析确定充血性心力衰竭、瓣膜性心脏病、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作史以及年龄为死亡的独立危险因素。然而,与接受双腔起搏的患者相比,接受心室起搏的患者生存率有下降趋势,但这种差异未达到统计学意义(p = 0.0556)。起搏模式不是独立的危险因素(p = 0.23)。年龄<80岁患者的观察生存率显著低于预期(p<0.0001),而年龄≥80岁患者的生存率与预期相似(p = 0.22)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验