Greenberg W M, Otero J, Villanueva L
General Adult Services, Bergen Pines County Hospital, Paramus, New Jersey 07652.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994 Aug;20(3):355-71. doi: 10.3109/00952999409106020.
Irregular discharges, previously studied on psychiatric or substance abuse treatment units, are a particular problem for dual diagnosis units. We examined demographic and clinical variables for their association with irregular discharge from an acute dual diagnosis inpatient unit, retrospectively reviewing 316 consecutive admissions. One hundred and nineteen patients (37.7%) were irregularly discharged (61 AMA, 31 administrative, 27 elopements), staying an average of 18.8 days compared with 51.4 days for those regularly discharged (p < .001). Younger age (p = .007) and discharge diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder (p < .001) were associated with irregular discharge; the attending psychiatrist was also significant (p = .016). Demographic variables (sex, ethnicity, marital status, religion, employment, education, living circumstances), Axis I diagnosis, and type and number of substances abused were not predictive of discharge type. Patients irregularly discharged within the first week (40% of irregular discharges) were significantly less likely to have known legal involvement (p = .006). No significant temporal clustering of irregular discharges was found on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, nor was a seasonal pattern detected. These findings are generally consistent with several pre-DSM-III studies on nondual diagnosis units, but more specifically highlight the diagnosis of antisocial personality. Regarding program completion, they suggest that risk factors for irregular discharge (substance abuse, antisocial personality, characteristics of the doctor-patient relationship, problems of younger patients) have not been adequately addressed simply by creating dual diagnosis units. Further programming study appears warranted to address the problem of patient retention on dual diagnosis units.
此前在精神科或药物滥用治疗病房进行过研究的违规出院情况,对于双重诊断病房来说是一个特殊问题。我们回顾性审查了316例连续入院病例,研究了人口统计学和临床变量与急性双重诊断住院病房违规出院之间的关联。119名患者(37.7%)违规出院(61例自动出院、31例行政出院、27例擅自离院),平均住院18.8天,而正常出院患者的平均住院时间为51.4天(p<0.001)。年龄较小(p=0.007)和出院诊断为反社会人格障碍(p<0.001)与违规出院相关;主治精神科医生也有显著关联(p=0.016)。人口统计学变量(性别、种族、婚姻状况、宗教、就业、教育、生活环境)、轴I诊断以及滥用物质的类型和数量均不能预测出院类型。在第一周内违规出院的患者(占违规出院患者的40%)已知有法律介入的可能性显著较低(p=0.006)。在每日、每周或每月的基础上均未发现违规出院有明显的时间聚集现象,也未检测到季节性模式。这些发现总体上与DSM-III之前对非双重诊断病房的几项研究一致,但更具体地突出了反社会人格的诊断。关于项目完成情况,这些发现表明,仅通过设立双重诊断病房,并未充分解决违规出院的风险因素(药物滥用、反社会人格、医患关系特征、年轻患者问题)。似乎有必要进行进一步的项目研究,以解决双重诊断病房患者留院的问题。