Agostinucci J
Physical Therapy Program, College of Human Sciences and Services, University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Nov;75(11):1233-40. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90011-6.
The effect that topical anesthetics has on cutaneous sensation and on soleus motoneuron reflex excitability was studied in a healthy population. Data were obtained from 16 volunteers (7 men and 9 women) between 20 and 47 years of age. The experiment consisted or recording H-reflexes and Achilles tendon reflexes (ATR) before and after administration of a 20% benzocaine spray or a placebo to the skin of the posterior calf. In addition, a sensory evaluation was conducted to determine objectively the actual quality of anesthesia obtained. Subjects served as their own controls, randomly receiving both the active medication and a placebo. The study was conducted in a single blind fashion with only the experimenter being aware of what medication (active/placebo) was being applied during a given experiment. H-reflex amplitudes increased significantly following the application of benzocaine and the placebo spray compared to control (p < .01). This increase was similar whether the active drug or placebo was administered. No significant difference was shown between active benzocaine and the placebo application. The ATR was not significantly affected by any of the treatment techniques used in this study, although some reduction in reflex amplitude was noted. No change in skin sensibility could be attributed to the topical anesthetic in any subject in this study. It was concluded that benzocaine spray did not have an effect on skin sensation and that the increased motoneuron reflex excitability was more likely in response to a stimulatory action upon cutaneous receptors from the spray technique. It is further suggested that topical anesthetics applied to intact skin may not permeate cutaneous tissue in large enough quantities to have a desensitizing effect.
在健康人群中研究了局部麻醉剂对皮肤感觉和比目鱼肌运动神经元反射兴奋性的影响。数据来自16名年龄在20至47岁之间的志愿者(7名男性和9名女性)。实验包括在给小腿后侧皮肤喷洒20%苯佐卡因喷雾或安慰剂之前和之后记录H反射和跟腱反射(ATR)。此外,进行了感觉评估以客观确定所获得麻醉的实际效果。受试者作为自身对照,随机接受活性药物和安慰剂。该研究以单盲方式进行,只有实验者知道在给定实验中应用的是哪种药物(活性药物/安慰剂)。与对照组相比,喷洒苯佐卡因和安慰剂喷雾后H反射幅度显著增加(p <.01)。无论给予活性药物还是安慰剂,这种增加都是相似的。活性苯佐卡因和安慰剂应用之间没有显示出显著差异。本研究中使用的任何治疗技术对ATR均无显著影响,尽管注意到反射幅度有一些降低。在本研究的任何受试者中,皮肤敏感性的变化都不能归因于局部麻醉剂。得出的结论是,苯佐卡因喷雾对皮肤感觉没有影响,运动神经元反射兴奋性增加更可能是对喷雾技术对皮肤感受器的刺激作用的反应。进一步表明,应用于完整皮肤的局部麻醉剂可能不会以足够大的量渗透皮肤组织以产生脱敏作用。