Peters R W, Hall J W
Department of Medical Allied Health Professions, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7190.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):2674-82. doi: 10.1121/1.411446.
Thresholds for the detection of a 1.0-kHz pure tone were measured in modulated and unmodulated noise for a group of nine elderly listeners, aged 62-83, with normal or near-normal audiograms, and a reference group of seven younger normal-hearing listeners. The masker was either a band of noise 128 Hz wide [approximately one equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) centered at 1.0 kHz], or a band of noise 1505 Hz wide (approximately five ERBs above and five ERBs below 1.0 kHz). The noise was either unmodulated or was square-wave modulated at rates of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Hz. A measure of comodulation masking release (CMR) was derived from the masking data. Because wider filters have been found to be associated with reduced CMR, auditory filter shapes were also estimated for the elderly listeners. The filters were found to be normal at the center frequencies of 800, 1000, and 2000 Hz ruling out possible confounding effects of impaired auditory filters on CMR. Masked detection thresholds were generally significantly higher for the elderly as compared to the younger listeners for both unmodulated and modulated noise. Thresholds were lower in modulated as compared to unmodulated noise masking for both elderly and young listeners. For both groups of listeners and for both narrow- and wideband masking, detection thresholds continued to increase as modulation rates were increased. CMR was not different for the elderly and young listeners and it was similarly decreased, for both groups, at higher rates of modulation.
对一组年龄在62至83岁之间、听力图正常或接近正常的九名老年听众,以及一组七名听力正常的年轻听众,测量了在调制噪声和未调制噪声中检测1.0千赫兹纯音的阈值。掩蔽音要么是一个128赫兹宽的噪声带[大约一个等效矩形带宽(ERB),以1.0千赫兹为中心],要么是一个1505赫兹宽的噪声带(在1.0千赫兹上下各约五个ERB)。噪声要么是未调制的,要么是以10、20、30、40和50赫兹的速率进行方波调制。从掩蔽数据中得出了共调制掩蔽释放(CMR)的测量值。由于已发现较宽的滤波器与降低的CMR相关,因此还为老年听众估计了听觉滤波器的形状。发现在800、1000和2000赫兹的中心频率处,滤波器是正常的,排除了听觉滤波器受损对CMR可能产生的混杂影响。对于未调制和调制噪声,老年听众的掩蔽检测阈值通常明显高于年轻听众。对于老年和年轻听众,调制噪声掩蔽下的阈值均低于未调制噪声掩蔽下的阈值。对于两组听众以及窄带和宽带掩蔽,随着调制速率的增加,检测阈值持续升高。老年和年轻听众的CMR没有差异,并且在较高的调制速率下,两组的CMR均同样降低。