Stoudemire A, Hill C D, Dalton S T, Marquardt M G
Medical Psychiatric Unit, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Dec;42(12):1282-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06512.x.
To determine (1) if a "high risk" period for rehospitalization can be identified in a population of depressed older adults and (2) if age of onset and previous history of depression is associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization.
Naturalistic, longitudinal treatment outcome study.
Medical-psychiatry unit and outpatient clinic at a university hospital.
Ninety-four older adults diagnosed with major depression based on SCID and DSM-III-R criteria who were hospitalized for treatment.
All patients were initially hospitalized on a medical-psychiatry unit and treated with either antidepressants or electroconvulsive therapy.
Patients were initially evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and a battery of neuro-psychological and behavioral tests. Patients were followed over time with an average follow-up interval of 3.09 + 1.45 years, and the date of the first psychiatric rehospitalization (if any) was recorded.
Approximately 43.6 percent of the total sample required at least one psychiatric rehospitalization. The greatest risk of rehospitalization occurred in the first 18 months. No significant differences were noted between patient groups treated with ECT and those treated with antidepressants or between patients with a younger and those with an older age of onset of depressive disorder. A statistical trend was observed in which patients without previous episodes of depression had a lower overall rate of rehospitalization compared with patients with one or more previous episodes of depression.
There appears to be a relatively high risk of psychiatric rehospitalization in depressed older adults, particularly in the first 18 months. This rate of rehospitalization underscores the importance of providing maintenance therapy and intensive psychiatric supervision for a minimum of 18 months to 2 years during the course of a depressive episode requiring inpatient hospitalization.
确定(1)能否在老年抑郁症患者群体中识别出再住院的“高危”期,以及(2)发病年龄和既往抑郁症病史是否与再住院风险增加相关。
自然主义的纵向治疗结果研究。
大学医院的医学-精神病科病房和门诊诊所。
94名根据SCID和DSM-III-R标准被诊断为重度抑郁症并住院治疗的老年人。
所有患者最初均入住医学-精神病科病房,接受抗抑郁药或电休克治疗。
患者最初接受DSM-III-R结构化临床访谈(SCID)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表以及一系列神经心理学和行为测试评估。对患者进行随访,平均随访间隔为3.09±1.45年,并记录首次精神科再住院日期(如有)。
总样本中约43.6%的患者至少需要一次精神科再住院治疗。再住院风险最高的时期是在最初的18个月内。接受电休克治疗的患者组与接受抗抑郁药治疗的患者组之间,以及抑郁症发病年龄较轻和较重的患者之间,均未发现显著差异。观察到一种统计学趋势,即与有一次或多次既往抑郁症发作的患者相比,无既往抑郁症发作的患者总体再住院率较低。
老年抑郁症患者精神科再住院风险似乎相对较高,尤其是在最初的18个月内。这种再住院率凸显了在需要住院治疗的抑郁发作期间,提供至少18个月至2年的维持治疗和强化精神科监护的重要性。