• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于比较的学习:类别学习过程中比较实例的效果。

Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning.

作者信息

Spalding T L, Ross B H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1251-63. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1251.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1251
PMID:7983463
Abstract

When learning about a category, people often compare new instances with similar old instances and notice features common to the compared instances. Five experiments demonstrate that such comparisons cause features common to compared instances to be considered more important for the category than equally frequent features that are not common to compared instances. Experiment 1 shows that what is learned depends on which instances are compared. Experiment 2 investigates the conditions under which comparison-based learning occurs. The next experiments find that these comparisons affect subjective feature frequency (Experiment 3) and sensitivity to feature correlations (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 shows that comparisons during early learning affect what is learned from later instances. The discussion focuses on the implications for models of category representation.

摘要

在学习一个类别时,人们常常会将新的实例与相似的旧实例进行比较,并注意到被比较实例共有的特征。五项实验表明,这种比较会使被比较实例共有的特征在该类别中被视为比未被比较实例共有的同等频繁出现的特征更为重要。实验1表明所学内容取决于所比较的实例。实验2研究基于比较的学习发生的条件。接下来的实验发现,这些比较会影响主观特征频率(实验3)和对特征相关性的敏感度(实验4)。实验5表明早期学习过程中的比较会影响从后续实例中学到的内容。讨论集中在对类别表征模型的启示上。

相似文献

1
Comparison-based learning: effects of comparing instances during category learning.基于比较的学习:类别学习过程中比较实例的效果。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1251-63. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1251.
2
Learning relational concepts from within- versus between-category comparisons.从类别内比较与类别间比较中学习关系概念。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1571-1596. doi: 10.1037/xge0000517.
3
Same, varied, or both? Contextual support aids young children in generalizing category labels.相同、多样还是兼具?语境支持帮助幼儿泛化类别标签。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):150-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
4
Concept learning and feature interpretation.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):439-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03198559.
5
Category representation for classification and feature inference.用于分类和特征推断的类别表示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1433-58. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1433.
6
The effects of category use on learned categories.类别使用对所学类别的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jan;28(1):51-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03211576.
7
Acquisition of categorical color perception: a perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis.范畴性颜色感知的习得:语言相对论假设的一种知觉学习方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Dec;131(4):477-93.
8
Category learning in Alzheimer's disease and normal cognitive aging depends on initial experience of feature variability.阿尔茨海默病和正常认知衰老中的类别学习取决于特征变异性的初始体验。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Apr;98:98-110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.通过分类和特征推理了解类别的内部结构。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1786-807. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.871567. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.学习由不同实例组成的类别:分类、推理和结构对齐的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jan;28(1):64-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03211577.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptively triggered comparisons enhance perceptual category learning: evidence from face learning.自适应触发的比较增强了知觉类别学习:来自面孔学习的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70163-6.
2
Comparisons in Adaptive Perceptual Category Learning.适应性感知类别学习中的比较
Cogsci. 2022 Jul;44:2372-2378.
3
Learning situated emotions.学习情境情绪。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Aug;145:106637. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Use of evidence in a categorization task: analytic and holistic processing modes.分类任务中证据的使用:分析性与整体性加工模式。
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):431-446. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0829-2. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study.梳理类别学习:类别结构和时间安排影响交错学习相对于集中学习的优势。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):481-95. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0.
6
Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.提醒会影响对模棱两可刺激的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):107-13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0476-2.
7
Comparison and mapping facilitate relation discovery and predication.比较和映射有助于关系发现和预测。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e63889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063889. Print 2013.
8
Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization.将情绪植根于情境化概念化中。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1105-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
9
Category learning in the context of co-presented items.共同呈现项目背景下的类别学习。
Cogn Process. 2011 May;12(2):161-75. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0377-5. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
10
Recent exposure affects artifact naming.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):687-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03196425.