Suppr超能文献

一项单盲研究,旨在评估萘普生凝胶与双氯芬酸乳胶剂相比在治疗软组织损伤方面的疗效和安全性。

Single blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of naproxen gel compared with diclophenac emulgel in the treatment of soft tissue injuries.

作者信息

Butrón F, Galicia A, Zamora G, Martinez-Zurita F

机构信息

Hospital General de Zona 2A IMSS, México D.F.

出版信息

Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 1994;37:153-6.

PMID:7984652
Abstract

Sixty four adult patients of both genders with injuries such as contusions and sprains were studied. Of these, 34 were treated with 10% naproxen gel and 30 with 1% dichlophenaco gel topically given for 4 days. Various pain modalities, edema and functional alterations of areas involved were studied. Naproxen reduced spontaneous pain slightly better than dichlophenaco. Both drugs resulted in significant reduction of other pain modalities, edema and functional alterations (p < 0.001). A lower percentage (29%) of naproxen patients used paracetamol as additional pain reliever compared to dichlophenaco patients (36%). Local adverse events were minimum for both groups.

摘要

对64名患有挫伤和扭伤等损伤的成年男女患者进行了研究。其中,34名患者接受10%萘普生凝胶治疗,30名患者接受1%双氯芬酸凝胶局部给药4天。研究了各种疼痛形式、水肿以及受累部位的功能改变。萘普生在减轻自发痛方面略优于双氯芬酸。两种药物均能显著减轻其他疼痛形式、水肿和功能改变(p<0.001)。与使用双氯芬酸的患者(36%)相比,使用萘普生的患者中使用对乙酰氨基酚作为额外止痛药的比例较低(29%)。两组的局部不良事件均为最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验