Leader W G, Tsubaki T, Chandler M H
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Sep 1;51(17):2125-30.
The Cockcroft-Gault and Salazar-Corcoran equations were compared with respect to prediction of gentamicin pharmacokinetic values in obese and nonobese patients, and the results were used to formulate guidelines for calculating initial gentamicin dosages in obese patients. Creatinine clearance (CLcr) was estimated by applying the Cockcroft-Gault equation using total body weight (TBW), ideal body weight (IBW), and dosage weight (DW) and with Salazar-Corcoran equations using fat-free body mass (FBM) in 100 obese and 100 nonobese patients. Gentamicin pharmacokinetic values (k, CL, and t1/2) were estimated by using CLcr estimated by each method and standardized to a body surface area of 1.73 sq m. Actual pharmacokinetic values were determined by using steady-state gentamicin concentrations and a modified Sawchuk-Zaske equation; these values were compared with the predicted values. In the obese patients, pharmacokinetic values predicted from standardized CLcr by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using estimated DW were not significantly biased, compared with actual values; most predictions produced by the other methods were significantly biased. Predictions produced by the DW method were generally more precise than those resulting from the other methods. In nonobese patients, k values estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using IBW were not significantly biased, while values obtained with all other methods were biased. All methods were biased when predicting CL and t1/2 in nonobese patients. Significant correlations existed between standardized estimates of CLcr (by all methods) and pharmacokinetic values in both groups. Predictions of gentamicin k, CL, and t1/2 were best overall when CLcr was estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using DW, rather than by other methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
比较了Cockcroft-Gault方程和Salazar-Corcoran方程对肥胖和非肥胖患者庆大霉素药代动力学值的预测情况,并将结果用于制定肥胖患者初始庆大霉素剂量的计算指南。在100例肥胖患者和100例非肥胖患者中,应用Cockcroft-Gault方程,分别采用总体重(TBW)、理想体重(IBW)和剂量体重(DW)来估算肌酐清除率(CLcr),同时应用Salazar-Corcoran方程,采用去脂体重(FBM)来估算肌酐清除率。通过每种方法估算的CLcr来估算庆大霉素药代动力学值(k、CL和t1/2),并将其标准化至1.73平方米的体表面积。实际药代动力学值通过稳态庆大霉素浓度和改良的Sawchuk-Zaske方程确定;将这些值与预测值进行比较。在肥胖患者中,与实际值相比,使用估算的DW通过Cockcroft-Gault方程从标准化CLcr预测的药代动力学值无显著偏差;其他方法产生的大多数预测存在显著偏差。DW方法产生的预测通常比其他方法更精确。在非肥胖患者中,使用IBW通过Cockcroft-Gault方程估算的k值无显著偏差,而使用所有其他方法获得的值存在偏差。在预测非肥胖患者的CL和t1/2时,所有方法均存在偏差。两组中CLcr的标准化估算值(所有方法)与药代动力学值之间均存在显著相关性。总体而言,当使用DW通过Cockcroft-Gault方程估算CLcr时,对庆大霉素k、CL和t1/2的预测最佳,而非其他方法。(摘要截断于250字)