Dionne R E, Bauer L A, Gibson G A, Griffen W O, Blouin R A
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1981 Jun;38(6):841-4.
Estimates of creatinine clearance (Clcr), using five methods, were compared to measured Clcr in morbidity obese patients. Patients whose total body weight (TBW) was greater than or equal to 195% of their ideal body weight (IBW) and who had urinary Clcr measured with 24-hour urine collections were studied. The 12 men weighed an average of 180 kg; the 31 women averaged 138 kg. The methods studied considered a combination of the following factors: weight, age, sex, and serum creatinine. One method was a nomogram; TBW could not be used because of limitations of the nomogram. Both TBW and IBW were used in two methods that considered weight as a variable. Measured Clcr averaged 105.7 ml/min/1.73 sq m body surface area. All estimating methods using IBW significantly underestimated Clcr; all methods using TBW significantly overestimated Clcr. Two methods that did not include body weight as a variable predicted Clcr more accurately than did other methods, but there was still a significant difference between estimated and measured Clcr. None of the Clcr estimation methods is accurate in morbidly obese patients.
采用五种方法估算病态肥胖患者的肌酐清除率(Clcr),并与实测Clcr进行比较。研究对象为总体重(TBW)大于或等于理想体重(IBW)195%且通过24小时尿液收集测定尿Clcr的患者。12名男性平均体重180千克;31名女性平均体重138千克。所研究的方法综合考虑了以下因素:体重、年龄、性别和血清肌酐。一种方法是列线图;由于列线图的局限性,无法使用TBW。在两种将体重视为变量的方法中同时使用了TBW和IBW。实测Clcr平均为105.7毫升/分钟/1.73平方米体表面积。所有使用IBW的估算方法均显著低估了Clcr;所有使用TBW的方法均显著高估了Clcr。两种未将体重作为变量的方法预测Clcr比其他方法更准确,但估算值与实测值之间仍存在显著差异。在病态肥胖患者中,没有一种Clcr估算方法是准确的。