Suppr超能文献

入职前测试中的组内常模制定及其他分数调整形式。

Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing.

作者信息

Sackett P R, Wilk S L

机构信息

Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 1994 Nov;49(11):929-54. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.49.11.929.

Abstract

Various forms of score adjustment have been suggested and used when mean differences by gender, race, or ethnicity are found using preemployment tests. This article examines the rationales for score adjustment and describes and compares different forms of score adjustment, including within-group norming, bonus points, separate cutoffs, and banding. It reviews the legal environment for personnel selection and the circumstances leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. It examines score adjustment in the use of cognitive ability tests, personality inventories, interest inventories, scored biographical data, and physical ability tests and outlines the implications for testing practice of various interpretations of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

摘要

当在入职前测试中发现按性别、种族或民族存在平均差异时,人们提出并采用了各种形式的分数调整方法。本文探讨了分数调整的基本原理,描述并比较了不同形式的分数调整,包括组内常态化、加分、单独的分数线以及分数区间划分。本文回顾了人员选拔的法律环境以及导致1991年《民权法案》通过的相关情况。本文研究了在认知能力测试、人格量表、兴趣量表、计分传记资料和体能测试中使用的分数调整,并概述了对1991年《民权法案》的各种解释对测试实践的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验