Sackett P R, Wilk S L
Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Am Psychol. 1994 Nov;49(11):929-54. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.49.11.929.
Various forms of score adjustment have been suggested and used when mean differences by gender, race, or ethnicity are found using preemployment tests. This article examines the rationales for score adjustment and describes and compares different forms of score adjustment, including within-group norming, bonus points, separate cutoffs, and banding. It reviews the legal environment for personnel selection and the circumstances leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. It examines score adjustment in the use of cognitive ability tests, personality inventories, interest inventories, scored biographical data, and physical ability tests and outlines the implications for testing practice of various interpretations of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
当在入职前测试中发现按性别、种族或民族存在平均差异时,人们提出并采用了各种形式的分数调整方法。本文探讨了分数调整的基本原理,描述并比较了不同形式的分数调整,包括组内常态化、加分、单独的分数线以及分数区间划分。本文回顾了人员选拔的法律环境以及导致1991年《民权法案》通过的相关情况。本文研究了在认知能力测试、人格量表、兴趣量表、计分传记资料和体能测试中使用的分数调整,并概述了对1991年《民权法案》的各种解释对测试实践的影响。