• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向合理饮酒的概念及措施说明。

Towards a concept of sensible drinking and an illustration of measure.

作者信息

Harburg E, Gleiberman L, Difranceisco W, Peele S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104.

出版信息

Alcohol Alcohol. 1994 Jul;29(4):439-50.

PMID:7986282
Abstract

The major focus of research on alcohol is not on the majority who drink without problems, but on the small minority who have extreme problems. Difficulty in conceiving, measuring, and analyzing non-problem drinking lies in the exclusively problem-drinking orientation of most drinking measures. Drawing on conventionally used scales (e.g. Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test) and other established concepts in the alcohol literature (e.g. craving, hangover), a set of 24 items was selected to classify all persons in a sample from Tecumseh, Michigan, as to their alcohol-related behaviors (N = 1266). A Sensible-Problem Drinking Classification (SPDC) was developed with five categories: very sensible, sensible, borderline, problem, and impaired. A variety of known alcohol and psychosocial variables were related monotonically across these categories in expected directions. Ethanol ounces per week was only modestly related to SPDC groups: R2 = 0.09 for women, R2 = 0.21 for men. The positive relationship of problem and non-problem SPDC groups to high and low blood pressure was P = 0.07, while ethanol (oz/week) was uncorrelated to blood pressure (mm Hg) in this subsample (N = 453). The development of SPDC requires additional items measuring self and group regulatory alcohol behavior. However, this initial analysis of no-problem subgroups has direct import for public health regulation of alcohol use by providing a model of a sensible view of alcohol use.

摘要

酒精研究的主要焦点并非那些饮酒无问题的大多数人,而是少数有极端问题的人。难以构思、衡量和分析无问题饮酒的原因在于大多数饮酒测量方法完全以问题饮酒为导向。借鉴传统使用的量表(如密歇根酒精ism筛查简短测试)以及酒精文献中的其他既定概念(如渴望、宿醉),从密歇根州蒂卡姆西的一个样本(N = 1266)中选取了一组24个项目,以对所有人的酒精相关行为进行分类。开发了一种明智 - 问题饮酒分类法(SPDC),分为五个类别:非常明智、明智、临界、问题和受损。各种已知的酒精和心理社会变量在这些类别中按照预期方向单调相关。每周乙醇盎司数与SPDC组的相关性仅为中等:女性的R2 = 0.09,男性的R2 = 0.21。问题和非问题SPDC组与高血压和低血压的正相关关系为P = 0.07,而在此子样本(N = 453)中,乙醇(盎司/周)与血压(毫米汞柱)不相关。SPDC的开发需要额外的项目来测量自我和群体对酒精行为的调节。然而,对无问题亚组的这一初步分析通过提供一种明智的酒精使用观点模型,对酒精使用的公共卫生监管具有直接意义。

相似文献

1
Towards a concept of sensible drinking and an illustration of measure.迈向合理饮酒的概念及措施说明。
Alcohol Alcohol. 1994 Jul;29(4):439-50.
2
Development and initial validation of the Hangover Symptoms Scale: prevalence and correlates of Hangover Symptoms in college students.宿醉症状量表的编制与初步验证:大学生宿醉症状的患病率及其相关因素
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Sep;27(9):1442-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000085585.81711.AE.
3
Does participation in an alcohol administration study increase risk for excessive drinking?参与酒精给药研究是否会增加过度饮酒的风险?
Alcohol. 2005 Nov;37(3):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.02.002.
4
Alcohol problems among patients attending five primary health care clinics in Harare city.哈拉雷市五家初级保健诊所患者中的酒精问题。
Cent Afr J Med. 1993 Feb;39(2):26-32.
5
WHO/ISBRA Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence: analysis of demographic, behavioral, physiologic, and drinking variables that contribute to dependence and seeking treatment. International Society on Biomedical Research on Alcoholism.世界卫生组织/国际酒精使用与依赖状态及特质标志物研究:对导致依赖和寻求治疗的人口统计学、行为学、生理学及饮酒变量的分析。国际酒精中毒生物医学研究学会。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Jul;26(7):1047-61.
6
The craving withdrawal model for alcoholism: towards the DSM-V. Improving the discriminant validity of alcohol use disorder diagnosis.酒精成瘾的渴求戒断模型:迈向《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版。提高酒精使用障碍诊断的判别效度。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Jul-Aug;40(4):314-22. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh166. Epub 2005 May 9.
7
Alcohol deprivation effect is prolonged in the alcohol preferring (P) rat after repeated deprivations.在反复剥夺后,酒精偏好(P)大鼠的酒精剥夺效应会延长。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jan;24(1):8-16.
8
[Categories of alcohol consumers and the criteria for classification].[酒精消费者类别及分类标准]
Biomedica. 2009 Dec;29(4):635-46.
9
[Health Risk drinking and problematic consumption of alcohol in Pomerania: comparative analysis of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) compared with the Federal German Health and Examination Survey in 1998].波美拉尼亚地区的健康风险饮酒与酒精问题消费:波美拉尼亚健康研究(SHIP)与1998年德国联邦健康与检查调查的比较分析
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Jan;67(1):39-47. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813829.
10
Problem drinking and alcohol problems. Widening the circle of covariation.问题饮酒与酒精问题。扩大共变范围。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1990;8:173-201.