Suppr超能文献

医疗保险索赔数据的内部验证

Internal validation of Medicare claims data.

作者信息

Baron J A, Lu-Yao G, Barrett J, McLerran D, Fisher E S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1994 Sep;5(5):541-4.

PMID:7986870
Abstract

The Medicare database is commonly used for epidemiology and health services research, but validation of its data by chart review or questionnaire may be difficult and expensive. Since hospital and physician bills are independent in Medicare, however, these two data sources can be used to supplement and corroborate each other. This "internal validation" is illustrated here for hip fracture and prostatectomy. Agreement of the hospital and physician data streams regarding site of hip fracture (neck vs other), treatment of hip fracture (internal fixation vs arthroplasty), and type of prostatectomy (transurethral resection of prostate, open, or radical) was excellent, with percentage of agreement generally between 89% and 99%, and kappa statistics typically between 0.74 and 0.95. When validation with outside data sources is not readily available, such internal validation of Medicare data may be valuable.

摘要

医疗保险数据库常用于流行病学和卫生服务研究,但通过病历审查或问卷调查对其数据进行验证可能既困难又昂贵。然而,由于医疗保险中医院账单和医生账单是独立的,这两个数据源可用于相互补充和佐证。本文以髋部骨折和前列腺切除术为例展示了这种“内部验证”。医院和医生数据流在髋部骨折部位(颈部与其他部位)、髋部骨折治疗方式(内固定与关节成形术)以及前列腺切除术类型(经尿道前列腺切除术、开放式或根治性)方面的一致性非常好,一致率通常在89%至99%之间,kappa统计量通常在0.74至0.95之间。当无法轻易获得外部数据源进行验证时,对医疗保险数据进行这种内部验证可能很有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验