Shoffner D H, Davis M W, Bowen S M
University of Tennessee College of Nursing, Knoxville 37996-4110.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1994 Fall;26(3):181-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00310.x.
The traditional ways that academia has approached documentation of scholarship are relatively narrow and best fit those disciplines whose practice is research and writing. In professional practice disciplines such as nursing, writing and research are critical, but they are not the only scholarly activities in which faculty are involved. A model resulting from work from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching offers a broader view of scholarship in which clinical teaching has academic legitimacy. The components of scholarship included in the model are discovery, practice, integration, and teaching.
学术界记录学术成果的传统方式相对狭隘,最适合那些以研究和写作为实践内容的学科。在护理等专业实践学科中,写作和研究固然至关重要,但它们并非教师参与的唯一学术活动。卡内基教学促进基金会的一项工作成果提出了一种更宽泛的学术观,其中临床教学具有学术合理性。该模式所包含的学术组成部分有发现、实践、整合和教学。