• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定工作的申请人库与认知能力测试的全国常模:对效度研究中范围限制校正的影响。

Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.

作者信息

Sackett P R, Ostgaard D J

机构信息

Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 1994 Oct;79(5):680-4. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.680.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.680
PMID:7989275
Abstract

Correcting validity coefficients for range restriction requires the applicant pool predictor standard deviation (SD). As this is frequently unknown, some researchers use national norm SDs as estimates of the applicant pool SD. To test the proposition that job-specific applicant pools are markedly more homogeneous than broad samples of applicants for many jobs, job-specific applicant pool SDs on the Wonderlic Personnel Test for 80 jobs were compared with a large multijob applicant sample. For jobs at other than the lowest level of complexity, job-specific applicant pool SDs average 10% lower than the broad norm group SDs. Ninety percent of the job-specific applicant pool SDs lie within 20% of the norm group SD, suggesting that reducing a norm group SD by 20% provides a conservative estimate of the applicant pool SD for use in range restriction corrections for other than low-complexity jobs.

摘要

校正范围限制的效度系数需要申请人库预测指标的标准差(SD)。由于这一标准差常常未知,一些研究人员使用全国常模标准差作为申请人库标准差的估计值。为了检验特定工作的申请人库比许多工作的广泛申请人样本明显更具同质性这一命题,将80项工作的旺德利克人员测试中特定工作的申请人库标准差与一个大型多工作申请人样本进行了比较。对于复杂度并非最低水平的工作,特定工作的申请人库标准差平均比广泛常模组标准差低10%。90%的特定工作申请人库标准差落在常模组标准差的20%范围内,这表明将常模组标准差降低20%可为除低复杂度工作外的其他工作范围限制校正提供保守的申请人库标准差估计值。

相似文献

1
Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.特定工作的申请人库与认知能力测试的全国常模:对效度研究中范围限制校正的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 1994 Oct;79(5):680-4. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.680.
2
Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for personality scales: implications for range-restriction corrections in validation research.特定工作的申请人库与人格量表的全国常模:对效度研究中范围限制校正的启示
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):570-7. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.570.
3
Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.你是谁?:关于效标关联和差异有效性研究中基于现任者的范围限制估计的(不)准确性。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 May;102(5):802-828. doi: 10.1037/apl0000193. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
4
A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.一种用于估计多元综合预测指标有效性的拟议方法的检验:扩展工作要素有效性模型。
Psychol Rep. 2009 Dec;105(3 Pt 1):900-16. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.900-916.
5
Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.评估中心与认知能力测验:对效标关联效度的传统观点提出挑战。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Oct;102(10):1435-1447. doi: 10.1037/apl0000236. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.实质与形式:对激励情境下社会期望的新审视。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):211-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.211.
7
Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes.求职者对组织的吸引力与工作选择:对招聘结果相关因素的元分析综述
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):928-44. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928.
8
Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF.航空公司在职飞行员、申请者与16种人格因素问卷(16PF)一般人群常模的人格比较。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Jun;92(3 Pt 1):773-80. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.773.
9
A longitudinal meta-analysis of range restriction estimates and general mental ability validity coefficients: Better addressing overcorrection amid decline effects.
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Dec;109(12):1901-1920. doi: 10.1037/apl0001214. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
Personality traits within a pediatric surgery fellowship applicant pool.儿科手术 fellowship 申请人库中的人格特质。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-Analysis of the Validity of General Mental Ability for Five Performance Criteria: Hunter and Hunter (1984) Revisited.一般心理能力对五项绩效标准有效性的元分析:重温亨特与亨特(1984年)的研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 17;10:2227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02227. eCollection 2019.