Suppr超能文献

低剂量利尿剂疗法治疗轻至中度高血压患者。

Lower dose diuretic therapy in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Hall W D, Weber M A, Ferdinand K, Flamenbaum W, Marbury T, Jain A K, Weidler D, Weiss R, Herron J, Codispoti J

机构信息

Hypertension Research Centre, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, GA 30030.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Aug;8(8):571-5.

PMID:7990083
Abstract

Indapamide (Lozol), an indoline antihypertensive drug with diuretic and vasodilating activities, was evaluated in 195 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting DBP between 95 and 110 mmHg) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group design trial. A four week single-blind placebo wash-out period was followed by an eight week double-blind period. Patients were randomised to indapamide 1.25 mg/day or to placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in sitting DBP from baseline to week 8. Ninety patients in the placebo group (93%) and 82 patients (84%) in the indapamide group completed the eight weeks of double-blind therapy. Indapamide produced a mean (SE) decrease in sitting DBP of 7.4 (0.63) mmHg (from 100.1 to 92.8 mmHg) compared with a decrease of 3.6 (0.75) mmHg (from 99.6 to 95.8 mmHg) produced by placebo (p < 0.0001). Indapamide and placebo also produced mean decreases in standing DBP of 6.8 (0.75) and 2.8 (0.77) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0002), in sitting SBP of 11.1 (1.18) and 3.2 (1.35) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0001) and in standing SBP of 11.4 (1.29) and 4.0 (1.43) mmHg, respectively (P = 0.0002). Reduction in BP of > or = 10 mmHg or to a DBP of < or = 90 mmHg was more frequent (P = 0.0005) among indapamide (46.6%) compared with placebo (23.7%) treated patients. During the eight week double-blind treatment period, incidence rates for all adverse experiences and for drug-related adverse experiences were similar between the two treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

吲达帕胺(洛沙坦)是一种具有利尿和血管舒张活性的吲哚类抗高血压药物,在一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组设计试验中,对195例轻度至中度原发性高血压患者(坐位舒张压在95至110 mmHg之间)进行了评估。在为期四周的单盲安慰剂洗脱期后,进入为期八周的双盲期。患者被随机分为每日服用1.25 mg吲达帕胺组或安慰剂组。主要疗效终点是从基线到第8周坐位舒张压的平均变化。安慰剂组90例患者(93%)和吲达帕胺组82例患者(84%)完成了八周的双盲治疗。与安慰剂使坐位舒张压降低3.6(0.75)mmHg(从99.6降至95.8 mmHg)相比,吲达帕胺使坐位舒张压平均(SE)降低7.4(0.63)mmHg(从100.1降至92.8 mmHg)(p<0.0001)。吲达帕胺和安慰剂使立位舒张压分别平均降低6.8(0.75)和2.8(0.77)mmHg(p = 0.0002),坐位收缩压分别平均降低11.1(1.18)和3.2(1.35)mmHg(p = 0.0001),立位收缩压分别平均降低11.4(1.29)和4.0(1.43)mmHg(P = 0.0002)。与安慰剂治疗的患者(23.7%)相比,吲达帕胺治疗的患者(46.6%)血压降低≥10 mmHg或舒张压≤90 mmHg更为常见(P = 0.0005)。在为期八周的双盲治疗期间,两个治疗组的所有不良事件和与药物相关的不良事件发生率相似。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验