House of Lords is asked to rule on breadth of gene patent coverage.
作者信息
Dickson D
出版信息
Nature. 1994 Dec 8;372(6506):487-8. doi: 10.1038/372487a0.
DOI:10.1038/372487a0
PMID:7990909
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
House of Lords is asked to rule on breadth of gene patent coverage.英国上议院被要求就基因专利覆盖范围的广度做出裁决。
Nature. 1994 Dec 8;372(6506):487-8. doi: 10.1038/372487a0.
2
More patent troubles about genes.更多关于基因的专利问题。
Nature. 1994 Dec 8;372(6506):485. doi: 10.1038/372485a0.
3
Patent infringement. High court asked to rule on what makes an idea new.
Science. 2001 Dec 21;294(5551):2460-1. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5551.2460.
4
Decoding gene patents in Australia.解读澳大利亚的基因专利
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Oct 3;5(1):a020909. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020909.
5
US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.美国最高法院对具有里程碑意义的基因专利案作出裁决。
Pharm Pat Anal. 2013 Sep;2(5):581. doi: 10.4155/ppa.13.54.
6
[Genetic comment on patenting of biotechnology inventions in the adaptation of the Spanish Patenting Law to the European framework].[关于西班牙专利法在适应欧洲框架过程中生物技术发明专利申请的遗传学评论]
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2002 Jan-Jun(16):199-221.
7
Patenting pieces of people.为人体部位申请专利。
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;21(4):341. doi: 10.1038/nbt0403-341.
8
European Parliament rejects move to restrict genetics.欧洲议会否决了限制遗传学的提议。
Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):572. doi: 10.1038/414572a.
9
Mixed reaction greets new gene patent proposals from Brussels.布鲁塞尔提出的新基因专利提案引发了不同反应。
Nature. 1993 Jan 28;361(6410):285. doi: 10.1038/361285a0.
10
US to rule on research patent.美国将对研究专利作出裁决。
Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):587. doi: 10.1038/440587a.
Zotero 插件