• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌骨骨折修复:新技术的特定适应症。

Mandible fracture repair: specific indications for newer techniques.

作者信息

Terris D J, Lalakea M L, Tuffo K M, Shinn J B

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Dec;111(6):751-7. doi: 10.1177/019459989411100609.

DOI:10.1177/019459989411100609
PMID:7991255
Abstract

Mandible fracture repair is commonly undertaken by otolaryngologists. Although the essential principles of reduction and immobilization are undisputed, the approach used to obtain these goals varies considerably. We performed a critical evaluation of all mandible fractures treated at the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center by the otolaryngology service between January 1988 and February 1992, with the purpose of better defining the indications for plate fixation and for the use of more traditional techniques. One hundred eighty-three fractures in 112 patients were evaluable. Thirty-six (32.1%) of these patients had at least one plate placed (group A); 39 (34.8%) underwent an open procedure, with interosseous wire fixation (group B); and 37 (33.0%) were treated with closed techniques (group C). The severity of fracture (indexed by comminution, presence of infection, teeth in the fracture line, interval to repair, and whether the fracture was open or closed) was similar in plated and nonplated mandibles. Mean (+/- standard deviation) operative times for the three groups were 3.2 +/- 1.6 hours for group A, 3.0 +/- 0.9 hours for group B, and 1.4 +/- 0.5 hours for group C. The number of follow-up visits required was not statistically different (group A, 5.6 +/- 3.8 visits; group B, 5.2 +/- 2.5 visits; and group C, 5.3 +/- 2.0 visits). The overall incidence of major complications was 14.3% (16 of 112), including 11 of 36 (30.6%) in group A, 4 of 39 (10.3%) in group B, and 1 of 37 (2.7%) in group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

下颌骨骨折修复通常由耳鼻喉科医生进行。尽管复位和固定的基本原则无可争议,但实现这些目标所采用的方法却有很大差异。我们对1988年1月至1992年2月期间在圣克拉拉谷医疗中心接受耳鼻喉科治疗的所有下颌骨骨折进行了严格评估,目的是更好地确定钢板固定和使用更传统技术的适应症。112例患者中的183处骨折可进行评估。这些患者中有36例(32.1%)至少置入了一块钢板(A组);39例(34.8%)接受了开放手术,采用骨间钢丝固定(B组);37例(33.0%)采用闭合技术治疗(C组)。钢板固定和未固定的下颌骨骨折的严重程度(根据粉碎程度、感染情况、骨折线处的牙齿、修复间隔以及骨折是开放性还是闭合性来衡量)相似。三组的平均(±标准差)手术时间分别为:A组3.2±1.6小时,B组3.0±0.9小时,C组1.4±0.5小时。所需的随访次数在统计学上没有差异(A组5.6±3.8次;B组5.2±2.5次;C组5.3±2.0次)。主要并发症的总发生率为14.3%(112例中的16例),其中A组36例中有11例(30.6%),B组39例中有4例(10.3%),C组37例中有1例(2.7%)。(摘要截于250字)

相似文献

1
Mandible fracture repair: specific indications for newer techniques.下颌骨骨折修复:新技术的特定适应症。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Dec;111(6):751-7. doi: 10.1177/019459989411100609.
2
Treatment of comminuted fractures of the mandible.下颌骨粉碎性骨折的治疗。
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1997 Mar;5(1):157-79.
3
Mandibular fractures treated by bone plating and intraosseous wiring. A comparative study.采用接骨板和骨内钢丝固定治疗下颌骨骨折的对比研究。
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1994;95(5):386-90.
4
Evaluation of mandibular fracture treatment.下颌骨骨折治疗的评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1993 Sep;21(6):251-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80042-3.
5
Volar locking plates versus Kirschner wires for distal radial fractures--a cost analysis study.掌侧锁定钢板与克氏针治疗桡骨远端骨折的成本分析研究。
Injury. 2009 Dec;40(12):1279-81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.02.018. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
6
Traditional methods vs rigid internal fixation of mandible fractures.传统方法与下颌骨骨折的坚固内固定
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Jul;121(7):750-3. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890070036008.
7
Clinical implementation of a multidirectional, angular stable osteosynthesis system in maxillofacial traumatology.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;36(3):157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.08.008. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?在下颌角骨折切开复位内固定术中,使用牙弓夹板或牙间结扎固定对于获得成功的治疗效果是否必要?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):2116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.370.
9
Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.锁定重建钢板相关感染:一项回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;61(4):462-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50089.
10
Locking compression plate osteosynthesis of complicated mandibular fractures in six horses.六匹马复杂下颌骨骨折的锁定加压钢板接骨术
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(1):54-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Delay Impact on Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review.治疗延迟对下颌骨骨折切开复位内固定术的影响:一项系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jun 18;6(6):e1829. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001829. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
Hardware Removal in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Management Algorithm.颅颌面创伤中的内固定物取出:文献系统综述与处理流程
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Nov;75(5):572-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000194.
3
Treatment of mandibular fractures by two perpendicular mini-plates.
使用两块垂直微型接骨板治疗下颌骨骨折。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;26(74):31-6.