Bohadana A B, Massin N, Teculescu D, Peslin R
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM-U. 115, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Respir Med. 1994 Sep;88(8):581-7. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80005-8.
Methacholine airway challenge (MAC) is a simple and useful means to assess bronchial hyperreactivity in workers exposed to various occupational hazards. Recently, wheeze detection by tracheal auscultation has been proposed as an indicator of bronchial responsiveness during bronchial provocation test in children. Our aim was to examine the relationship between the appearance of wheezes and the concurrent changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) observed during MAC test in adults. Three cumulative doses of a methacholine solution (100 micrograms, 500 micrograms and 1500 micrograms) were inhaled by 45 workers with occupational exposure to flour dust. Spirometry was done using an electronic spirometer. Tracheal sounds were recorded with an electronic stethoscope placed over the anterior cervical triangle, 2 cm above the sternal notch. The amplified sounds were stored on magnetic tape, band-pass filtered (50-2000 Hz), and digitized at a sampling rate of 4096 Hz into a GenRad Vibration Control System. Wheezes were detected by fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis and their presence compared to a 20% fall in FEV1. A positive MAC test by spirometry was found in 12 subjects whereas wheezes were identified in 14 subjects. Among the wheezing subjects, nine had a positive MAC test (range of fall in FEV1 = 20.6 to 42.3%) and five had a negative one (range of fall in FEV1 = 3.6 to 16.9%). Moreover, no wheezes were found in the remaining three subjects with a positive MAC test (range of fall in FEV1 = 20.7 to 27.4%). Taking a 20% fall in FEV1 as reference, wheezes were 75% sensitive and 84.8% specific to detect airflow obstruction. In conclusion, since it carries a significant although small false-negative rate, the acoustic technique based upon wheeze detection cannot, at the present time, fully replace spirometry during airway challenge testing in subjects with suspected asthma.
乙酰甲胆碱气道激发试验(MAC)是评估接触各种职业危害因素的工人支气管高反应性的一种简单且有用的方法。最近,有人提出通过气管听诊检测喘息作为儿童支气管激发试验期间支气管反应性的指标。我们的目的是研究成人MAC试验期间喘息的出现与一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的同时变化之间的关系。45名职业性接触面粉粉尘的工人吸入了三种累积剂量的乙酰甲胆碱溶液(100微克、500微克和1500微克)。使用电子肺活量计进行肺功能测定。用电子听诊器置于胸骨切迹上方2厘米处的颈前三角区记录气管声音。放大后的声音存储在磁带上,进行带通滤波(50 - 2000赫兹),并以4096赫兹的采样率数字化到GenRad振动控制系统中。通过快速傅里叶变换(FFT)分析检测喘息,并将其存在情况与FEV1下降20%进行比较。通过肺功能测定发现12名受试者MAC试验阳性,而14名受试者检测到喘息。在喘息受试者中,9名MAC试验阳性(FEV1下降范围 = 20.6%至42.3%),5名MAC试验阴性(FEV1下降范围 = 3.6%至16.9%)。此外,其余3名MAC试验阳性的受试者未检测到喘息(FEV1下降范围 = 20.7%至27.4%)。以FEV1下降20%为参考,喘息检测气流阻塞的敏感性为75%,特异性为84.8%。总之,由于基于喘息检测的声学技术存在显著但较小的假阴性率,目前在疑似哮喘患者的气道激发试验中,它不能完全替代肺功能测定。