Frenette P S, Thirlwell M P, Trudeau M, Thomson D M, Joseph L, Shuster J S
Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Department of Medicine, Que., Canada.
Tumour Biol. 1994;15(5):247-54. doi: 10.1159/000217898.
In the past decade, considerable interest has arisen for defining the role of various tumor markers in the diagnosis of cancer. This cross-sectional study evaluates four breast cancer markers (CA 27-29, CA 15-3, MCA and CEA) and two gastrointestinal (GI) markers (CA 19-9 and CEA) in 213 patients. Receiver operating curves (ROC) revealed a sensitivity for the 90% specificity cutoff for breast cancers compared to breast benign diseases of 70% for CA 27-29, 67.5% for CA 15-3, 52.5% for MCA and 40% for CEA. When GI tumors were compared to benign GI disease, the sensitivity for 90% specificity was 40.3% for CEA and 32.3% for CA 19-9. Comparison of breast cancer and GI malignancies with other malignancies leads to a marked shift of the ROC curve to the right and loss of specificity. Late stage for all breast and GI tumor markers was found to be a predictor of high serum antigen level (p < 0.001). The presence of liver metastases in breast cancer was associated with abnormal levels of CA 27-29 (p = 0.028). Pancreas adenocarcinomas had a higher CA 19-9 antigen level (p < 0.001) than other GI malignancies. CA 27-29 appears to be at least as sensitive and specific as CA 15-3 in patients with breast cancer. None of the above markers retain their specificity when compared with a control group consisting of other malignancies.
在过去十年中,人们对确定各种肿瘤标志物在癌症诊断中的作用产生了浓厚兴趣。这项横断面研究评估了213例患者的四种乳腺癌标志物(CA 27-29、CA 15-3、MCA和CEA)和两种胃肠道(GI)标志物(CA 19-9和CEA)。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)显示,与乳腺良性疾病相比,乳腺癌在90%特异性临界值时,CA 27-29的敏感性为70%,CA 15-3为67.5%,MCA为52.5%,CEA为40%。当将胃肠道肿瘤与良性胃肠道疾病进行比较时,CEA在90%特异性时的敏感性为40.3%,CA 19-9为32.3%。将乳腺癌和胃肠道恶性肿瘤与其他恶性肿瘤进行比较,会导致ROC曲线明显右移且特异性丧失。发现所有乳腺和胃肠道肿瘤标志物的晚期是血清抗原水平升高的一个预测指标(p < 0.001)。乳腺癌中肝转移的存在与CA 27-29水平异常相关(p = 0.028)。胰腺腺癌的CA 19-9抗原水平高于其他胃肠道恶性肿瘤(p < 0.001)。在乳腺癌患者中,CA 27-29似乎至少与CA 15-3一样敏感和特异。与由其他恶性肿瘤组成的对照组相比,上述标志物均不具有特异性。