Bostrom M P, Asnis S E, Ernberg J J, Wright T M, Giddings V L, Berberian W S, Missri A A
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021.
J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Oct;8(5):422-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199410000-00009.
Because wire fixation continues to be used extensively in the practice of orthopaedic surgery, despite a high incidence of wire breakage, understanding the mechanism of this failure is of important clinical interest. The aim of this study was to investigate the failure of cerclage stainless steel wire using an in vitro cyclic loading device. A stainless steel testing fixture consisting of two half cylinders with a combined diameter of 2.5 cm was mounted in a servo hydraulic testing machine. Specimens of number 18 gauge (0.97 mm diameter) and number 16 gauge (1.22 mm diameter) 316L stainless steel wire were mounted around the two half cylinders in a cerclage manner using three different fastening methods: a uniform symmetrical twist, a knot twist, and a square knot. Single-load-to-failure and cyclic load tests were performed under controlled tensile displacement. The cerclage wire system fastened with a twist resulted in failure at loads significantly lower than systems fastened with the knot twist and the square knot. Cyclic loading of the wire fastened with twists also showed decreased fatigue properties when compared to those fastened with the knot twist and the square knot. In all tests, the 16-gauge wire was found to be clearly superior to the 18-gauge wire. For both wires, fatigue strengths at 100,000 cycles were only 30-37% of the static ultimate strength. These results show that wire diameter and fastening system are two important factors affecting the mechanical properties of the resulting fixation.
尽管钢丝断裂的发生率很高,但钢丝固定在骨科手术实践中仍被广泛使用,因此了解这种失败的机制具有重要的临床意义。本研究的目的是使用体外循环加载装置研究环扎不锈钢丝的失效情况。一个由两个直径为2.5厘米的半圆柱体组成的不锈钢测试夹具安装在伺服液压试验机中。18号(直径0.97毫米)和16号(直径1.22毫米)316L不锈钢丝的样本以环扎方式围绕两个半圆柱体安装,使用三种不同的紧固方法:均匀对称扭转、结扭转和方结。在控制拉伸位移的情况下进行单载荷至失效和循环载荷试验。用扭转固定的环扎钢丝系统在载荷下的失效明显低于用结扭转和方结固定的系统。与用结扭转和方结固定的钢丝相比,用扭转固定的钢丝的循环加载也显示出疲劳性能下降。在所有测试中,发现16号钢丝明显优于18号钢丝。对于这两种钢丝,100,000次循环时的疲劳强度仅为静态极限强度的30-37%。这些结果表明,钢丝直径和紧固系统是影响最终固定机械性能的两个重要因素。