Lee C H, Carter D
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jan;164(1):81-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998574.
The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether a comparison of preoperative mammograms with radiographs of biopsy specimens is useful for determining the presence of residual breast tumor after an initial excision of impalpable breast cancer.
Radiographs of tissue specimens obtained at the initial biopsy of 125 impalpable breast cancers were compared with the preoperative mammograms to determine if the lesion seen on the mammogram was completely excised. All tumors were impalpable, necessitating preoperative wire localization. The biopsies were usually excisional, and no special efforts were made to remove additional surrounding tissue. Specimen radiographs were rated as showing no residual tumor if the lesion appeared to be completely excised, showing residual tumor if the lesion did not appear to be completely removed, or indeterminate for residual tumor if adequacy of excision was uncertain. The presence or absence of tumor at the margins of the surgical specimen was determined by histologic examination. These results were correlated with the presence or absence of residual breast cancer at subsequent mastectomy (n = 71) or reexcision (n = 54).
The specimen radiograph showed complete excision of the mammographic lesion in 79 (63%) of the 125 cases. Tumor was found at mastectomy or reexcision in 35 of these cases, giving a false-negative rate for residual tumor of 44%. Incomplete excision was shown on 39 specimen radiographs. Eight of these 39 had no residual tumor, giving a false-positive rate of 21%. The sensitivity of the specimen radiograph for predicting the presence of residual tumor was 49%, specificity was 77%, and overall accuracy was 62%. The accuracy of pathologic examination of the margins of the biopsy specimen for predicting residual breast cancer was 58%. The specimen radiograph alone correctly identified 18 cases of residual tumor in which biopsy margins were indeterminate or negative for the presence of tumor.
The specimen radiograph is not reliable enough to be used alone for determining the presence or absence of residual breast cancer after the initial excision of impalpable breast cancer. However, it can be of value in predicting the presence of residual tumor in those cases in which results of pathologic examination of biopsy specimen margins are either indeterminate or negative for the presence of tumor but the specimen radiograph shows incomplete excision of the mammographic lesion.
本研究的目的是确定术前乳房X线照片与活检标本的X线片进行比较,对于确定不可触及的乳腺癌初次切除后乳房残余肿瘤的存在是否有用。
将125例不可触及的乳腺癌初次活检时获取的组织标本的X线片与术前乳房X线照片进行比较,以确定乳房X线照片上所见病变是否被完全切除。所有肿瘤均不可触及,因此需要术前金属丝定位。活检通常为切除活检,未特别努力切除额外的周围组织。如果病变似乎被完全切除,标本X线片被评为无残余肿瘤;如果病变似乎未被完全切除,则评为有残余肿瘤;如果切除是否充分不确定,则评为残余肿瘤情况不确定。通过组织学检查确定手术标本边缘是否存在肿瘤。将这些结果与随后乳房切除术(n = 71)或再次切除(n = 54)时是否存在残余乳腺癌相关联。
在125例病例中的79例(63%)中,标本X线片显示乳房X线照片上的病变被完全切除。在这些病例中,有35例在乳房切除术或再次切除时发现有肿瘤,残余肿瘤的假阴性率为44%。39张标本X线片显示切除不完全。这39例中有8例无残余肿瘤,假阳性率为21%。标本X线片预测残余肿瘤存在的敏感性为49%,特异性为77%,总体准确率为62%。活检标本边缘的病理检查预测残余乳腺癌的准确率为58%。仅标本X线片就正确识别出18例残余肿瘤病例,这些病例中活检边缘对肿瘤存在情况不确定或为阴性。
标本X线片单独用于确定不可触及的乳腺癌初次切除后乳房残余癌的存在与否不够可靠。然而,在活检标本边缘的病理检查结果对肿瘤存在情况不确定或为阴性但标本X线片显示乳房X线照片上的病变切除不完全的那些病例中,它对于预测残余肿瘤的存在可能有价值。