Cağlayan S
Florence Nightingale College of Nursing, Istanbul University, Sişli, Turkey.
Am J Physiol. 1994 Dec;267(6 Pt 3):S81-6. doi: 10.1152/advances.1994.267.6.S81.
A three-year study was conducted in search of a better method of teaching physiology that would enhance the critical thinking skills of first-year nursing students in Istanbul University, Florence Nightingale College of Nursing. Three different methods of teaching were used: 1) a straight lecture method, 2) an active method with no previous preparation of students, 3) an active method with previous preparation. Each method was evaluated by end-of-term marks, student feedback in that year, and a follow-up the next year by questionnaires distributed to both students and nursing teachers. The results of end-of-term examinations and Student Acceptance Indexes, as well as comments of nursing teachers, show that the active method of teaching is better than straight lecture and that the active method is most effective when students are familiarized with it beforehand.
在伊斯坦布尔大学佛罗伦萨南丁格尔护理学院开展了一项为期三年的研究,旨在寻找一种更好的生理学教学方法,以提高一年级护理专业学生的批判性思维能力。研究采用了三种不同的教学方法:1)直接讲授法;2)学生无预先准备的主动教学法;3)学生有预先准备的主动教学法。每种教学方法都通过学期末成绩、当年学生反馈以及次年向学生和护理教师发放问卷进行的随访来评估。期末考试结果、学生接受指数以及护理教师的评价表明,主动教学法优于直接讲授法,并且当学生事先熟悉该方法时,主动教学法最为有效。