• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Electrophysiologic analysis of snap amplitude in orthodromic and antidromic studies.

作者信息

Meythaler J M, Tuel S M, Cross L L, Reichart R T, Wertsch J J

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Sep;34(6):323-9.

PMID:8001471
Abstract

In 1966, Buchthal and Rosenfalk established that the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude increased with increasing number of nerve fibers. Lambert and Dyck's in vitro study of the sural nerve, however, found the SNAP amplitude of a single fascicle was equivalent to the SNAP amplitude of the entire nerve. The current study confirmed Buchthal and Rosenfalk's original findings, and discovered an in vivo equivalent to Lambert and Dyck's findings. Ten subjects were used as their own controls. Orthodromic stimulation of both the index and middle fingers stimulated individually versus simultaneously revealed a significant increase in amplitude (p < 0.001). When the recording and stimulating electrodes were reversed, without physically changing the electrodes on the subject, there was no significant difference between the antidromic SNAP amplitudes recorded from separate fingers, or from both fingers simultaneously. Although in both cases the number of recorded nerve fibers approximately doubled, the effect on the SNAP amplitude was very different. This seemingly paradoxical result can be explained by electrophysiologic differences in the recording methods, without using the concept of fiber density.

摘要

相似文献

1
Electrophysiologic analysis of snap amplitude in orthodromic and antidromic studies.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Sep;34(6):323-9.
2
The influence of wrist thickness on amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials.手腕厚度对感觉神经动作电位幅度的影响。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;39(8):485-8.
3
Measuring sensory nerve action potential electrical power.测量感觉神经动作电位电功率。
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Mar;41(3):318-23. doi: 10.1002/mus.21513.
4
The consequences of stimulus intensity on sensory nerve action potentials.刺激强度对感觉神经动作电位的影响。
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Dec 15;185(1):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.09.018. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
5
Nerve conduction studies: orthodromic vs antidromic latencies.神经传导研究:顺向潜伏期与逆向潜伏期
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jul;71(8):579-82.
6
Comparison of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials obtained from all fingers on the same hand.对同一只手上所有手指的逆行感觉神经动作电位进行比较。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;42(2):125-8.
7
[Effects of interelectrode separation in sensory nerve conduction studies].[感觉神经传导研究中电极间距的影响]
No To Shinkei. 1999 Aug;51(8):699-702.
8
Effect of long-term implanted nerve cuff electrodes on the electrophysiological properties of human sensory nerves.长期植入式神经袖套电极对人感觉神经电生理特性的影响。
Artif Organs. 1997 Mar;21(3):207-9.
9
Spread of the radial SNAP: a pitfall in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using standard orthodromic sensory conduction study.桡侧感觉神经动作电位的扩散:标准顺向感觉神经传导研究在腕管综合征诊断中的一个陷阱。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;117(3):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.11.004. Epub 2006 Jan 3.
10
Compound sensory action potential in normal and pathological human nerves.正常和病理性人类神经中的复合感觉动作电位
Muscle Nerve. 2004 Apr;29(4):465-83. doi: 10.1002/mus.10524.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative contributions of the medial sural and peroneal communicating nerves to the sural nerve.腓肠内侧皮神经和腓总交通支对腓肠神经的相对贡献。
Yonsei Med J. 2006 Jun 30;47(3):415-22. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.3.415.