Neuzner J, Pitschner H F, Schlepper M
Max-Planck-Institut für physiologische und klinische Forschung, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim.
Herz. 1994 Oct;19(5):278-86.
Despite all advances in the diagnostic and therapy of cardiovascular diseases the mortality from malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias is still a major health problem. In addition to established therapeutic strategies in the prevention of sudden cardiac death such as antiarrhythmic drug treatment, catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic surgery the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator was introduced to clinical practice in 1980. The number of 50,000 overall implants reflects the current clinical status of the therapy with implantable cardioverters/defibrillators. Significant technical improvements in the defibrillator therapy may contribute to an increase in therapy acceptance. These advances include the introduction of nonthoracotomy lead systems, enhanced defibrillation efficacy, full programmable devices providing tiered electrical therapy, improved diagnostic Holter functions and enhanced arrhythmia detection algorithms. The major present goals of defibrillator therapy are, detection and termination of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, reduction of sudden cardiac death, reduction in patient's mortality and improvement in quality of life. The efficacy and safety of defibrillator therapy to prevent sudden arrhythmic death has been proven in several large clinical investigations. The annual sudden cardiac death mortality is < 2% even in high-risk patient populations. Compared to sudden cardiac death rate there is a much higher rate of overall cardiac mortality because a defibrillator is not able to prevent nonarrhythmic cardiovascular deaths. There is a clinical impression that cardiovascular mortality is lower in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator compared to patients treated with other therapies. However there are no results from controlled studies providing scientific evidence that defribillator therapy can reduce overall cardiovascular mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管心血管疾病的诊断和治疗取得了诸多进展,但恶性室性心律失常导致的死亡率仍是一个重大的健康问题。除了预防心源性猝死的既定治疗策略,如抗心律失常药物治疗、导管消融或抗心律失常手术外,植入式心脏复律除颤器于1980年被引入临床实践。总体植入数量达5万例反映了目前植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的临床现状。除颤器治疗的重大技术改进可能有助于提高治疗的接受度。这些进展包括引入非开胸导联系统、增强除颤效果、提供分级电治疗的全可编程设备、改进的动态心电图诊断功能以及增强的心律失常检测算法。目前除颤器治疗的主要目标是检测和终止恶性室性心律失常、降低心源性猝死、降低患者死亡率以及提高生活质量。除颤器治疗预防心律失常性猝死的有效性和安全性已在多项大型临床研究中得到证实。即使在高危患者群体中,每年的心源性猝死死亡率也<2%。与心源性猝死率相比,总体心脏死亡率要高得多,因为除颤器无法预防非心律失常性心血管死亡。临床上有一种印象,与接受其他治疗的患者相比,接受植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的患者心血管死亡率较低。然而,尚无对照研究结果提供科学证据表明除颤器治疗可降低总体心血管死亡率。(摘要截选至250词)