Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平和氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压患者的双盲比较。

Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Ram C V, Ames R P, Applegate W B, Burris J F, Davidov M E, Mroczek W J

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-8899.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1994 May;17(5):251-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960170506.

Abstract

In the final analysis of this study at Week 26, 26% of the patients randomized to receive amlodipine attained blood pressure control with amlodipine alone compared with 33% of the patients allocated to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Neither amlodipine nor HCTZ produced clinically significant changes in pulse rate or in the electrocardiogram. Amlodipine treatment did not appear to produce clinically significant changes in blood lipids; HCTZ, however, produced an increase in total plasma cholesterol (delta 22.9 +/- 8.6 mg/dl). The incidence of side effects and the rate of patient withdrawal in the amlodipine and HCTZ groups were comparable. As expected, HCTZ therapy caused well-recognized biochemical alterations in cholesterol and potassium levels, whereas amlodipine was metabolically neutral.

摘要

在本研究第26周的最终分析中,随机接受氨氯地平治疗的患者中,26%仅使用氨氯地平就实现了血压控制,而分配接受氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)治疗的患者这一比例为33%。氨氯地平和HCTZ对脉搏率或心电图均未产生临床上显著的变化。氨氯地平治疗似乎未对血脂产生临床上显著的变化;然而,HCTZ使血浆总胆固醇升高(增加22.9±8.6mg/dl)。氨氯地平和HCTZ组的副作用发生率和患者退出率相当。正如预期的那样,HCTZ治疗引起了胆固醇和钾水平公认的生化改变,而氨氯地平在代谢方面是中性的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验