Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪三联疗法治疗中重度高血压:评估疗效和安全性的二次分析。

Amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide triple combination therapy in moderate/severe hypertension: Secondary analyses evaluating efficacy and safety.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Sleep/Wake Disorders Center, 35294, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2009 Nov;26(11):1012-23. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0077-7. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An 8-week trial of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val/HCTZ) for moderate or severe hypertension demonstrated more-pronounced blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects compared with dual-component therapies. To elucidate the effects of time and baseline BP on the observed responses, exploratory analyses were performed.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-85 years with mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP) 145 to <200 mmHg and mean sitting diastolic BP (MSDBP) 100 to <120 mmHg were randomized to Aml 10 mg/Val 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg; Val 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg; Aml 10 mg/Val 320 mg; or Aml 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg. During the first 2 weeks, regimens were force-titrated in two stages.

RESULTS

All least-square mean reductions in MSSBP and MSDBP (baseline to Week 3 and end of study) were significantly greater with triple therapy than with each dual therapy in the overall population and the severe systolic subgroup (baseline MSSBP > or =180 mmHg; except vs. Aml 10 mg/Val 320 mg at Week 3). At Week 3, more patients on triple therapy achieved MSSBP reductions of > or =-60, > or =-50, > or =-40, > or =-30, and > or =-20 mmHg (2.5%, 9.7%, 23.2%, 46.9% and 74.5%, respectively) than those on dual therapy (1.1%-2%, 5.6%-5.9%, 14.5%-16.7%, 33.5%-39.1%, and 58.8%-65.5%, respectively); this was also true at study endpoint. End-of-study MSSBP reductions were greater in triple-therapy recipients who had higher (vs. lower) baseline MSSBPs. LSM reductions ranged from -27.2 mmHg for baseline MSSBP 145 to <150 mmHg, to > or =49.6 mmHg for baseline MSSBP > or =180 mmHg. All treatments were well tolerated regardless of baseline MSSBP.

CONCLUSION

Aml 10 mg/Val 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg triple therapy is highly effective in reducing BP compared with dual components early in therapy, and systolic BP-lowering effects were proportionate to hypertension severity.

摘要

简介

一项为期 8 周的氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(Aml/Val/HCTZ)治疗中度或重度高血压的试验表明,与双成分治疗相比,该药物具有更显著的降压效果。为了阐明时间和基线血压对观察到的反应的影响,进行了探索性分析。

方法

年龄在 18-85 岁之间的患者,平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)为 145-<200mmHg,平均坐位舒张压(MSDBP)为 100-<120mmHg,随机分为 Aml 10mg/Val 320mg/HCTZ 25mg;Val 320mg/HCTZ 25mg;Aml 10mg/Val 320mg;或 Aml 10mg/HCTZ 25mg。在前 2 周,按两阶段强制滴定方案调整剂量。

结果

在整个研究人群和严重收缩期亚组(基线 MSSBP≥180mmHg;除了第 3 周时与 Aml 10mg/Val 320mg 相比)中,与每种双成分治疗相比,三联治疗的 MSSBP 和 MSDBP(从基线到第 3 周和研究结束)的最小二乘均数降低均显著更大。在第 3 周时,三联治疗组的患者中有更多的患者达到 MSSBP 降低≥-60mmHg、≥-50mmHg、≥-40mmHg、≥-30mmHg 和≥-20mmHg(分别为 2.5%、9.7%、23.2%、46.9%和 74.5%),而双成分治疗组分别为 1.1%-2%、5.6%-5.9%、14.5%-16.7%、33.5%-39.1%和 58.8%-65.5%(分别为 1.1%-2%、5.6%-5.9%、14.5%-16.7%、33.5%-39.1%和 58.8%-65.5%);这一结果在研究结束时也是如此。基线 MSSBP 较高(与基线 MSSBP 较低相比)的三联治疗组患者的期末 MSSBP 降低幅度更大。LSM 降低幅度从基线 MSSBP 145-<150mmHg 的-27.2mmHg,到基线 MSSBP≥180mmHg 的≥49.6mmHg。无论基线 MSSBP 如何,所有治疗均耐受良好。

结论

Aml 10mg/Val 320mg/HCTZ 25mg 三联疗法在早期治疗中比双成分治疗更有效地降低血压,并且收缩压降低效果与高血压严重程度成正比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验