• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在医学研究中的法律责任。

Legal liability of physicians in medical research.

作者信息

Sava H, Matlow P T, Sole M J

机构信息

Lang Michener, Barristers & Solicitors, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Clin Invest Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):148-84.

PMID:8004852
Abstract

The intent of this paper is to provide an overview, in layperson's language, of the concepts in law which may be applicable to a physician who undertakes research. The paper is divided into 2 parts. Part I deals with liability issues and standards of care. It is meant to enable the physician/researcher to recognize a potential liability situation. Part II examines insurance and related issues such as the role of the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA). The paper begins with a review of 2 potential categories of liability: criminal and civil tort. Next, legal issues surrounding the consent process, which form the majority of negligence claims, are dealt with. The research process is then discussed with emphasis on the Medical Research Council of Canada Guidelines on Human Experimentation. Part II covers how research projects are funded and identifies the parties from whom insurance coverage may be sought. Information is provided from the various sources offering insurance and quasi-insurance protection with special attention on the CMPA. Each source details the circumstances necessary for its particular coverage to be triggered. Other issues addressed include those arising when research is conducted outside Canada and multiple coverage.

摘要

本文旨在以通俗易懂的语言概述可能适用于从事研究工作的医生的法律概念。本文分为两部分。第一部分涉及责任问题和护理标准。其目的是使医生/研究人员能够识别潜在的责任情况。第二部分探讨保险及相关问题,如加拿大医学保护协会(CMPA)的作用。本文首先回顾了两类潜在的责任:刑事和民事侵权。接下来,处理了构成大多数过失索赔的围绕同意过程的法律问题。然后讨论了研究过程,重点是加拿大医学研究理事会关于人体实验的指南。第二部分涵盖研究项目的资金来源,并确定可能寻求保险的各方。提供了来自提供保险和准保险保护的各种来源的信息,特别关注CMPA。每个来源都详细说明了触发其特定保险范围所需的情况。其他涉及的问题包括在加拿大境外进行研究以及多重保险时出现的问题。

相似文献

1
Legal liability of physicians in medical research.医生在医学研究中的法律责任。
Clin Invest Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):148-84.
2
Structuring the issues in informed consent.
McGill Law J. 1981;26(4):740-808.
3
Information for consent in human experimentation.人体实验中的知情同意信息。
Univ Tor Law J. 1974 Autumn;24(4):381-410.
4
The law governing human experimentation in Quebec.魁北克关于人体实验的法律。
Rev Droit. 1991;22(1):77-108.
5
Individual researcher liability for clinical research on humans.人类临床研究中个体研究者的责任。
J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(2):8-16.
6
Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code.人体实验与组织捐赠:《民法典》第20 - 23条
McGill Law J. 1973;19(2):161-94.
7
Toward a theory of control of medical experimentation with human subjects: the role of compensation.
Case West Reserve Law Rev. 1975 Spring;25(3):604-48.
8
An overview of the legal aspects of human experimentation and research.人体实验与研究的法律层面概述。
J Forensic Sci. 1976 Apr;21(2):427-40.
9
Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.人体研究中研究者因疏忽导致的责任:知情同意与研究者的医疗过失行为
Wash Law Rev. 2003 Feb;78(1):229-63.
10
Conflict of interest in human research ethics.人类研究伦理中的利益冲突。
NCBHR Commun. 1995;6(2):5-10.