• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

II类:肌激动器与肌激动器-头帽联合矫治器的比较

Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.

作者信息

Oztürk Y, Tankuter N

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1994 Apr;16(2):149-57. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.2.149.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/16.2.149
PMID:8005202
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental effects of activator and activator high-pull headgear combination appliances on growing patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion. The material consisted of pre- and post-treatment cephalograms of 17 boys and 20 girls. Seventeen patients (eight male and nine female) were treated with an activator, the remaining 20 (9 male and 11 female) were treated with an activator high-pull headgear combination (AHGC) appliance. Changes due to treatment were compared with a group of 19 (nine male and ten female) untreated children. ANB angle was significantly reduced and mandibular growth development was favourable in both treatment groups. The AHGC appliance was more effective in the reduction of the maxillary prognathism. An increase of the anterior facial height and clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane was observed in the patients treated with activator appliance. The cant of the mandibular plane remained stable during both treatment periods. On the other hand, the forward displacement of the upper first molars was reduced significantly and the axial inclination of the lower incisors was controlled much better with the AHGC appliance.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估功能矫治器和功能矫治器-高位牵引头帽联合矫治器对生长发育期安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的骨骼和牙齿的影响。研究材料包括17名男孩和20名女孩治疗前和治疗后的头影测量片。17例患者(8例男性和9例女性)采用功能矫治器治疗,其余20例(9例男性和11例女性)采用功能矫治器-高位牵引头帽联合(AHGC)矫治器治疗。将治疗引起的变化与一组19例(9例男性和10例女性)未治疗的儿童进行比较。两个治疗组的ANB角均显著减小,下颌生长发育良好。AHGC矫治器在减少上颌前突方面更有效。在使用功能矫治器治疗的患者中,观察到前牙面高度增加和牙合平面顺时针旋转。在两个治疗阶段,下颌平面的倾斜度保持稳定。另一方面,AHGC矫治器能显著减少上颌第一磨牙的前移,更好地控制下切牙的轴倾度。

相似文献

1
Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.II类:肌激动器与肌激动器-头帽联合矫治器的比较
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Apr;16(2):149-57. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.2.149.
2
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.激活器与高位牵引头帽联合治疗的效果:骨骼、牙牙槽及软组织侧貌变化
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003.
3
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.固定正畸治疗前 Jasper 跳弓和激活头帽联合矫形器对牙颌骨骼的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May;143(5):684-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009.
4
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Jasper Jumper矫治器和颈带矫治器引起的牙颌面变化,随后进行固定正畸治疗。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028.
5
The correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination appliance.使用生物调节器-头帽联合矫治器矫治安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形
J Tongji Med Univ. 1997;17(4):254-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02895633.
6
Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.肌激动器-头帽治疗后牙牙槽和骨骼变化的长期稳定性。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):28-35. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp042. Epub 2009 May 28.
7
Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.功能矫治器与口外弓:头影测量叠加比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Mar;123(3):296-305. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.20.
8
Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.使用可摘功能性矫治器和头帽治疗混合牙列期的Ⅱ类开颌。
Quintessence Int. 1992 May;23(5):323-33.
9
A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.一种用于骨性II类错牙合治疗的与生长相关的概念。
Am J Orthod. 1978 Sep;74(3):258-75. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90202-6.
10
Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear.使用颈带式矫治器早期矫治II类错颌时的面部侧貌变化。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):960-7. doi: 10.2319/092106-384.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional Twin-Block Versus Cervical Headgear and Twin-Block Combination: Therapeutic Effects on the Craniofacial Structures in Growing Subjects.传统双阻板矫治器与颈带式矫治器联合双阻板矫治器:对生长发育期受试者颅面结构的治疗效果
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Sep 29;36(3):149-157. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.84.
2
Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.矫治器设计是否会影响安氏II类1分类错牙合的治疗效果?一项双中心回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021 Jun 30;12(2):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2021.12204. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
3
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.
儿童和青少年上前牙突出(安氏II类错牙合)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
4
Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形中Activator-头帽矫治器与双阻板矫治器治疗方法的比较
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4861924. doi: 10.1155/2017/4861924. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
5
The Goettingen "Pro-Stab" removable plate system. A retrospective cephalometric study of the effects of a new Class II treatment appliance.
J Orofac Orthop. 1997;58(6):320-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02682672.
6
[A retrospective evaluation of the treatment of skeletal Class-II with removable appliances].
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1995 May;56(3):140-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02276630.