Bartholomew R E
Flinders University of South Australia.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1994 Spring;40(1):46-60. doi: 10.1177/002076409404000105.
The few isolated reports of individual koro exhibit a symptomatology indicative of major psychiatric conditions (ie. psychosis or affective disorder), and appear unrelated to collective episodes which involve social, cultural, cognitive and physiological factors in the diffusion of koro-related beliefs. Yet, koro 'epidemics' continue to be viewed as exemplifying mass psychopathology or irrationality. An examination of the similarities between koro 'outbreaks' and a sub-category of behaviour which has been loosely labeled as 'mass hysteria', suggests an alternative, non-psychopathological explanation. In reclassifying 'epidemic' koro as a collective misperception rather than a culture-bound syndrome, it is argued that koro is a rational attempt at problem-solving which involves conformity dynamics, perceptual fallibility and the local acceptance of koro-associated folk realities, which are capable of explaining such episodes as normal within any given population.
关于个别缩阳症的少数孤立报告显示出的症状表明存在主要的精神疾病(即精神病或情感障碍),且似乎与涉及缩阳症相关观念传播中的社会、文化、认知和生理因素的集体发作无关。然而,缩阳症“流行”仍被视为群体精神病理学或非理性行为的例证。对缩阳症“爆发”与一类被宽泛地称为“群体癔症”的行为子类别之间的相似性进行考察后,提出了一种替代性的、非精神病理学的解释。在将“流行”性缩阳症重新归类为集体误解而非文化束缚综合征的过程中,有人认为缩阳症是一种解决问题的理性尝试,其中涉及从众动态、感知易误性以及当地对与缩阳症相关的民间现实的接受,这些能够解释在任何特定人群中此类发作是正常现象。