Riggle E D, Ellis A L
University of Kentucky, Department of Political Science, Lexington 40506-0027.
J Homosex. 1994;26(4):135-47. doi: 10.1300/J082v26n04_08.
Individuals' attitudes toward and acceptance of general legal principles were assessed along with their willingness to extend application of these principles to various social and political groups, including homosexuals. Respondents then indicated their attitudes toward various social and political groups, including the groups to whom they had applied the general principles. Regression analyses were used to determine to what degree acceptance of the general principle and attitude toward the social group predicted application of the general principle to the group. For disliked groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and Nazis, individuals' acceptance of the general principle alone predicted the specific application. For homosexuals, however, the application of the general principle was affected both by acceptance of the general principle and by individuals' attitudes toward homosexuals. The implications of this difference in light of research addressing the cognitive and affective nature of attitudes and attitude change is discussed.
研究评估了个体对一般法律原则的态度和接受程度,以及他们将这些原则应用于包括同性恋者在内的各种社会和政治群体的意愿。受访者随后表明了他们对各种社会和政治群体的态度,包括他们将一般原则应用于的那些群体。回归分析用于确定对一般原则的接受程度和对社会群体的态度在多大程度上预测了将一般原则应用于该群体的情况。对于诸如三K党和纳粹等不受欢迎的群体,仅个体对一般原则的接受程度就预测了具体的应用情况。然而,对于同性恋者,一般原则的应用既受到对一般原则的接受程度的影响,也受到个体对同性恋者态度的影响。本文讨论了根据关于态度及其变化的认知和情感性质的研究,这种差异所具有的意义。