Raynor E M, Shefner J M, Preston D C, Logigian E L
Division of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Jul;17(7):785-92. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170714.
The relative sensitivities of sensory, mixed nerve, and motor conduction studies in assessing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow have not yet been established. Using surface electrodes, we performed conduction studies across the elbow segment in 43 patients with symptoms referable to the ulnar nerve and 40 control subjects. Segmental slowing of motor conduction localized the lesion to the elbow in 14 of 21 patients (67%) with clear evidence of ulnar neuropathy on physical examination but only in 2 of 22 (9%) with subtle or no physical examination abnormalities. The diagnostic yield was increased by the finding of segmental slowing of sensory or mixed nerve conduction across the elbow to 86% and 68%, respectively, for each of the groups. We conclude that surface-recorded sensory and mixed nerve conduction studies appear to be more sensitive than motor studies in the electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and are especially valuable in patients with subtle clinical involvement.
感觉、混合神经和运动传导研究在评估肘部尺神经病变时的相对敏感性尚未确定。我们使用表面电极,对43例有尺神经相关症状的患者和40例对照者进行了肘部节段的传导研究。运动传导的节段性减慢将病变定位在肘部,在21例经体格检查有明确尺神经病变证据的患者中有14例(67%),但在22例体格检查有轻微异常或无异常的患者中只有2例(9%)。发现肘部感觉或混合神经传导的节段性减慢后,每组的诊断率分别提高到86%和68%。我们得出结论,表面记录的感觉和混合神经传导研究在肘部尺神经病变的电诊断中似乎比运动研究更敏感,对临床受累轻微的患者尤其有价值。