Kode L, Lieberman J M, Motta A O, Wilber J H, Vasen A, Yagan R
Department of Radiology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jul;163(1):141-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.1.8010201.
CT is often used after plain films to evaluate fractures of the tibial plateau. Because MR imaging can show associated soft-tissue injuries as well as fractures, we hypothesize that MR is superior to CT for imaging these injuries. Accordingly, we compared the efficacy of MR imaging and CT in 22 patients with tibial plateau fractures.
CT with two-dimensional reconstruction and MR examinations were performed in 22 patients with tibial plateau fractures. The images were interpreted by four radiologists and two orthopedic surgeons. Findings on CT scans and plain films were used to determine the configuration of the fractures and to classify them according to the Schatzker system. This was done with findings on MR images and plain films at a separate session. The MR images were also evaluated for ligamentous and meniscal injuries. A qualitative side-by-side comparison of two-dimensional CT scans and MR images for depiction of fracture configuration was done. Imaging results were correlated with observations from physical examinations in all patients and with surgical findings in 12 patients.
All of the six types of fractures of the Schatzker classification were observed in this series. Comparison of two-dimensional CT reconstructions and MR images for depiction of fracture configuration revealed that the two techniques were equal in 14 patients, MR imaging was superior to CT in five patients, and CT was superior to MR imaging in three patients (who had very complex and comminuted fractures). In addition, MR imaging showed 12 complete ligamentous tears and 15 partial ligamentous tears in 15 (68%) of the 22 patients. MR showed meniscal injuries in 12 (55%) of the 22 patients.
MR imaging was equivalent or superior to two-dimensional CT reconstruction for depiction of fracture configuration in most patients. In addition, MR showed significant soft-tissue injuries. We believe that MR imaging is the preferable imaging technique for most patients with fractures of the tibial plateau.
平片检查后常使用CT来评估胫骨平台骨折。由于磁共振成像(MR)既能显示相关软组织损伤,又能显示骨折情况,我们推测在对这些损伤进行成像方面,MR优于CT。因此,我们比较了22例胫骨平台骨折患者的MR成像和CT的效果。
对22例胫骨平台骨折患者进行了二维重建CT检查和MR检查。图像由4名放射科医生和2名骨科医生解读。利用CT扫描和平片的结果来确定骨折的形态,并根据Schatzker系统对其进行分类。这是在另一次会诊中根据MR图像和平片的结果完成的。还对MR图像进行了韧带和半月板损伤的评估。对二维CT扫描和MR图像描绘骨折形态进行了定性的并列比较。将成像结果与所有患者的体格检查结果以及12例患者的手术结果进行了关联。
本系列观察到了Schatzker分类的所有六种类型的骨折。对二维CT重建图像和MR图像描绘骨折形态的比较显示,两种技术在14例患者中效果相当,MR成像在5例患者中优于CT,CT在3例患者中(骨折非常复杂且粉碎)优于MR成像。此外,MR成像在22例患者中的15例(68%)显示了12处完全韧带撕裂和15处部分韧带撕裂。MR在22例患者中的12例(55%)显示了半月板损伤。
在大多数患者中,MR成像在描绘骨折形态方面等同于或优于二维CT重建。此外,MR显示了明显的软组织损伤。我们认为,对于大多数胫骨平台骨折患者,MR成像是更可取的成像技术。