Henry V L
Wellesley College.
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(3):285-311.
Courts in a number of jurisdictions have recently confronted questions of legal parentage concerning children conceived by alternative insemination. Typically, the biological mother is contesting the right of either the sperm donor or a non-biological co-parent to custody or visitation. This Note surveys the current state of the law and demonstrates a lack of protection for the rights of unmarried biological mothers and their co-parents. This Note then proposes a new paradigm for establishing the parties' rights and obligations, one that reflects the parties' pre-insemination, mutual intent regarding parenting responsibilities and encourages legal acknowledgement of and protection for the families people are creating with the help of AI.
一些司法管辖区的法院最近面临了与通过人工授精受孕的儿童的法定亲子关系相关的问题。通常情况下,生母会对精子捐赠者或非生物学共同父母的监护权或探视权提出质疑。本笔记调查了当前的法律状况,并表明未婚生母及其共同父母的权利缺乏保护。然后,本笔记提出了一种确立各方权利和义务的新范式,这种范式反映了各方在人工授精前对养育责任的共同意图,并鼓励对人们借助人工授精组建的家庭进行法律承认和保护。