[The echo-dobutamine and echo-dipyridamole tests in assessing vital myocardium and residual ischemia in myocardial infarct after thrombolysis].

The aim of the study was to compare the ability of dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography to detect stunned but viable myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction, to predict spontaneous functional recovery of the reperfused myocardium at 2 months and to detect myocardial ischemia in the infarcted area. Within 10 days from acute myocardial infarction, 47 patients, 29 anterior and 18 inferior, 41 Q-wave and 6 non Q-wave infarctions, underwent dobutamine echocardiography test at low-dose (5-10 mcg/kg/min over 5 min) and high-dose (20-40 mgc/kg/min over 3 min) and to dipyridamole echocardiography test (0.56 mg/kg over 4 min + 0.28 mg/kg over 2 min) in different days and in random order, after interruption of any vasoactive drug. Resting echocardiography was repeated at 2 months in 38/47 patients. Regional wall motion analysis was performed in a qualitative manner on a 14-segment model; viability was defined as improvement of 1 grade or more of at least 2 basally asynergic segments in the infarcted area. Ischemia was defined as an improvement followed by significant deterioration of contractility of the infarcted segments or deterioration of the infarcted area. All patients underwent coronary arteriography within 1 month from admission. Viability was detected by low-dose dobutamine in 34/47 patients (72%) and in 131/297 (44%) of basally asynergic segments compared to only 21/47 patients (45%) and in 66/297 segments (22%) detected by dipyridamole; myocardial ischemia was induced by dobutamine in 64% of patients compared to 36% by dipyridamole. Late spontaneous functional recovery was detected in 21/38 patients (57%) and in 70/244 (29%) of asynergic segments. Sensitivity of dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography for predicting spontaneous functional recovery was 70% and 46% specificity 69% and 83%, positive predictive value 48% and 52%, negative predictive value 85% and 79% respectively. Dobutamine correctly identified the presence of a significant stenosis of the infarct-related artery in 74% of cases compared with 43% of dipyridamole; specificity for detecting stenosis was 67% for dobutamine and 83% for dipyridamole. In conclusion, in patients with thrombolyzed myocardial infarction dobutamine echocardiography detects viable myocardium with late spontaneous recovery in a greater proportion of patients and segments than dipyridamole; dobutamine has a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity compared to dipyridamole for identifying a residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery that may jeopardize myocardium in the area at risk.