Shapiro R S
Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Apr;9(3):153-9. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90124-4.
Governments throughout the world have struggled for decades to ensure the availability of narcotic analgesics for legitimate medical and scientific purposes while controlling the abuse and illegal diversion of such substances. While the international drug-control system has effectively limited illicit trafficking of opioids, concerns remain about its effectiveness in ensuring the availability of these drugs for legitimate purposes. In the United States, federal legislation accommodates the use of controlled substances for medical and scientific purposes more effectively than does state law. Many states' controlled substance laws hinder appropriate opioid prescribing through (a) the use of ill-defined terms, (b) restriction of pain prescriptions to a specific number of dosage units; and/or (c) utilization of multiple-copy prescription programs. A more efficient state approach to monitoring inappropriate schedule II prescribing and dispensing may be through an electronic, computer-based pharmacy point-of-sale system, through which pharmacists can be alerted instantaneously to patients receiving the same drug from multiple pharmacies. In addition, states should consider modifying their approaches to drug abuse by adopting the revised Uniform Controlled Substances Act and/or establishing state pain initiatives.
几十年来,世界各国政府都在努力确保麻醉性镇痛药可用于合法的医疗和科研目的,同时控制此类药物的滥用和非法流通。虽然国际药物管制系统有效地限制了阿片类药物的非法贩运,但对于其确保这些药物用于合法目的的有效性仍存在担忧。在美国,联邦立法比州法律更有效地规范了管制物质用于医疗和科研目的的情况。许多州的管制物质法律通过以下方式阻碍了阿片类药物的合理处方:(a) 使用定义不明确的术语;(b) 将疼痛处方限制在特定数量的剂量单位;和/或(c) 采用多份处方程序。一种更有效的州级监测不适当的二类处方和配药的方法可能是通过基于计算机的电子药房销售点系统,通过该系统,药剂师可以立即收到患者从多家药店获取同一药物的警报。此外,各州应考虑通过采用修订后的《统一管制物质法》和/或制定州疼痛倡议来修改其药物滥用应对措施。