Aabo K, Vindeløv L L, Spang-Thomsen M
University Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Jul;70(1):91-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.255.
Clonal interaction between three subpopulations of Ehrlich carcinoma were studied during growth as mixed solid tumours and as ascites tumours in immune-incompetent nude NMRI mice. The tumour cell lines differed in DNA content as determined by DNA flow cytometry (FCM). Tumour growth was evaluated by tumour growth curves including calculation of tumour volume doubling times, tumour weight on day 14, cell cycle times (per cent labelled mitoses) and cell cycle distributions (FCM). Two subpopulations (E1.15 and E1.95) showed nearly identical growth characteristics during both solid and ascites tumour growth. The third subpopulation (E1.80) grew more slowly. FCM on fine-needle tumour aspirates was used to determine the relative proportions of the cell populations in mixed solid tumours in which E1.95 showed a growth-dominating effect on E1.15. No such effect was demonstrated during single-cell tumour growth in ascitic fluid in which the cells had no intimate contact. Ascitic fluid from E1.95-bearing animals or radiation-killed E1.95 cells had no effect on the growth of E1.15, and no remote effect was seen when the two cell lines were growing in opposite flanks. This indicates that only viable E1.95 cells in close in vivo contact were able to induce growth inhibition of the E1.15 subpopulation. Both the E1.95 and the E1.15 cells dominated the E1.80 cells, but in these cases cell kinetic differences may have played a role as the E1.95 and the E1.15 lines grew faster than the E1.80. The E1.80 cell line had no dominating effect on the E1.15 or E1.95. It is concluded that non-immunologically mediated cellular dominance in heterogeneous tumours may contribute to the evolution of these tumours and may be involved in fundamental tumour biological phenomena.
在免疫缺陷的裸NMRI小鼠中,将艾氏癌的三个亚群作为混合实体瘤和腹水瘤进行生长研究,观察它们之间的克隆相互作用。通过DNA流式细胞术(FCM)测定,肿瘤细胞系的DNA含量有所不同。通过肿瘤生长曲线评估肿瘤生长,包括计算肿瘤体积倍增时间、第14天的肿瘤重量、细胞周期时间(标记有丝分裂百分比)和细胞周期分布(FCM)。两个亚群(E1.15和E1.95)在实体瘤和腹水瘤生长过程中表现出几乎相同的生长特征。第三个亚群(E1.80)生长较慢。利用细针穿刺肿瘤抽吸物的FCM来确定混合实体瘤中细胞群体的相对比例,其中E1.95对E1.15显示出生长主导作用。在腹水单细胞肿瘤生长过程中未观察到这种作用,因为细胞之间没有密切接触。来自携带E1.95的动物的腹水或经辐射杀死的E1.95细胞对E1.15的生长没有影响,当两个细胞系在相反侧腹生长时也未观察到远程效应。这表明只有在体内紧密接触的活E1.95细胞能够诱导E1.15亚群的生长抑制。E1.95和E1.15细胞均对E1.80细胞起主导作用,但在这些情况下,细胞动力学差异可能起到了作用,因为E1.95和E1.15细胞系比E1.80生长得更快。E1.80细胞系对E1.15或E1.95没有主导作用。结论是,异质性肿瘤中非免疫介导的细胞主导作用可能有助于这些肿瘤的演变,并可能参与基本的肿瘤生物学现象。