Critelli G, Greco C, Liu S W, Sinatra R, Campa P P, Marino B
II Cattedra di Cardiologia, Università degli Studi La Sapienza, Roma.
Cardiologia. 1993 Dec;38(12 Suppl 1):397-408.
During the past decade, a variety of innovative procedures and devices for non-pharmacological treatment of tachyarrhythmias have been proposed. Recent improvements in the implantable cardioverter/defibrillators and transcatheter ablative techniques have resulted in a revolution of the therapeutic approach in ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, respectively, providing a valuable alternative to conventional antiarrhythmic surgery. Indeed, the selection criteria for surgery for tachyarrhythmias have been revised, and this therapeutic option is considered appropriate only for selected patients with postinfarction ventricular tachycardia. Ther implantable cardioverter/defibrillator has proved effective in conversion of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, leading a dramatic decrease in the incidence of sudden death in high risk subjects. Thus, with further refinements, a wide use of this therapeutic modality can be anticipated. Transcatheter ablation has become the first-line option in the most common forms of supraventricular tachycardias, such as accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia and AV nodal reentry. More recently, encouraging results of this technique in common atrial flutter and ectopic atrial tachycardia have been reported, although confirmation with larger series and longer follow-up is needed. In general, results of catheter ablation in ventricular tachycardia have been disappointing, with the exception of bundle branch reentry and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, in which a high success rate is reported. An increasingly important role of these therapeutic modalities is expected. In the meanwhile, due to their evolutional character and the specific competence required for their use, such procedures should be performed exclusively in well trained centers.
在过去十年中,人们提出了多种用于快速性心律失常非药物治疗的创新方法和装置。植入式心脏复律除颤器和经导管消融技术的最新进展,分别在室性和室上性快速性心律失常的治疗方法上引发了一场革命,为传统抗心律失常手术提供了一种有价值的替代方案。事实上,快速性心律失常的手术选择标准已经修订,这种治疗选择仅被认为适用于选定的心肌梗死后室性心动过速患者。植入式心脏复律除颤器已被证明在转复危及生命的快速性心律失常方面有效,导致高危人群的猝死发生率大幅下降。因此,随着进一步的改进,可以预期这种治疗方式会得到广泛应用。经导管消融已成为最常见形式的室上性心动过速,如旁路介导的心动过速和房室结折返性心动过速的一线治疗选择。最近,尽管需要更大规模的系列研究和更长时间的随访来证实,但已有报道称该技术在常见心房扑动和房性异位性心动过速中取得了令人鼓舞的结果。一般来说,导管消融治疗室性心动过速的结果令人失望,但束支折返性心动过速和特发性室性心动过速除外,这两种情况报道的成功率较高。预计这些治疗方式将发挥越来越重要的作用。与此同时,由于它们的不断发展的特性以及使用所需的特定能力,此类操作应仅在训练有素的中心进行。