Suppr超能文献

额颞叶变性的床旁评估:区分阿尔茨海默病与非阿尔茨海默病性皮质性痴呆

Bedside assessment of frontal degeneration: distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's cortical dementia.

作者信息

Royall D R, Mahurin R K, Cornell J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 1994 Apr-Jun;20(2):95-103. doi: 10.1080/03610739408253956.

Abstract

Two instruments, the Executive Interview (EXIT) and the Qualitative Evaluation of Dementia (QED), that are useful in the evaluation of frontal system failure are discussed. The ability of these instruments to discriminate frontal-type dementia (FTD) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the dementia of major depression (DMD) was examined in 100 consecutive elderly dementia patients presenting to a multidisciplinary geriatric clinic. All groups showed executive impairment by the EXIT, and 46% of the FTD patients were found to be unimpaired by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The AD and FTD groups differed significantly from the DMD group on the QED. The QED alone could not distinguish AD from FTD cases. However, mapping of EXIT scores against MMSE (errors) scores revealed that AD and FTD follow very different regression lines.

摘要

本文讨论了两种有助于评估额叶系统功能衰退的工具,即执行访谈(EXIT)和痴呆定性评估(QED)。在一家多学科老年病诊所就诊的100例连续性老年痴呆患者中,研究了这些工具区分额颞叶型痴呆(FTD)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)以及重度抑郁性痴呆(DMD)的能力。所有组在EXIT测试中均显示出执行功能损害,且46%的FTD患者在简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)测试中未表现出损害。AD组和FTD组在QED测试中与DMD组存在显著差异。仅QED无法区分AD和FTD病例。然而,将EXIT得分与MMSE(错误)得分进行映射分析发现,AD和FTD遵循非常不同的回归线。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验