Minshew N J, Goldstein G, Taylor H G, Siegel D J
University of Pittsburgh, PA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Apr;16(2):261-70. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402637.
Academic achievement levels in 54 high functioning (IQ > 70) autistic subjects were compared with those of 41 normal controls, who did not differ significantly in age, IQ, gender, race, or SES from the autistic subjects. The measures of academic achievement used included portions of the Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-2, the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. Based on prior neuropsychological findings, it was hypothesized that autistic subjects would not differ from controls on subtests assessing mechanical and procedural skills, but would differ on subtests measuring comprehension and interpretive skills. As predicted, the autistic subjects performed significantly less well than controls on comprehension tasks, but not on mechanical reading, spelling, and computational tasks. This pattern is at variance with the typical academic profile of individuals with disabilities in reading or spelling, but shares some features with the nonverbal learning disabilities.
对54名高功能(智商>70)自闭症患者的学业成就水平与41名正常对照组进行了比较,这些正常对照组在年龄、智商、性别、种族或社会经济地位方面与自闭症患者没有显著差异。所使用的学业成就测量方法包括《底特律学习能力倾向测验-2》、《伍德科克阅读掌握测验》和《考夫曼教育成就测验》的部分内容。基于先前的神经心理学研究结果,研究假设自闭症患者在评估机械和程序技能的子测验上与对照组没有差异,但在测量理解和解释技能的子测验上会有所不同。正如预测的那样,自闭症患者在理解任务上的表现明显不如对照组,但在机械阅读、拼写和计算任务上则不然。这种模式与阅读或拼写障碍个体的典型学业表现不同,但与非言语学习障碍有一些共同特征。