Muramoto T
Department of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Letters, Hokkaido University, Sapporo.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1994 Apr;65(1):47-53. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.65.47.
A speech act may be described as a sentence corresponding to locutionary act (L-sentence), illocutionary act (I-sentence), or perlocutionary act (P-sentence). The purpose of our research is to examine the effects of descriptive forms of speech acts in stories on recognition memory. Subjects read stories and received unexpected sentence recognition memory test either immediately, an hour later, or four hours later. They rated the degree of confidence of recognition judgement on 7-point scale. The results were as follows: (a) The sentence which had been actually presented in text was recognized correctly with higher confidence, independent of the descriptive forms, (b) The descriptive form in text did not influence the recognition rating by itself, (c) P-sentence tended to be judged as 'not actually presented in text' compared with L-sentence or I-sentence, (d) The recognition time was shortest under the 4-hours-delay condition. These results were discussed in terms of memory representation of sentences and recognition processes.
言语行为可以被描述为与言内行为(L 句)、言外行为(I 句)或言后行为(P 句)相对应的句子。我们研究的目的是考察故事中言语行为的描述形式对再认记忆的影响。受试者阅读故事,并在立即、一小时后或四小时后接受意外的句子再认记忆测试。他们用 7 点量表对再认判断的自信程度进行评分。结果如下:(a)文本中实际呈现的句子被正确再认,且自信度更高,与描述形式无关;(b)文本中的描述形式本身并不影响再认评分;(c)与 L 句或 I 句相比,P 句往往被判断为“未在文本中实际呈现”;(d)在 4 小时延迟条件下,再认时间最短。根据句子的记忆表征和再认过程对这些结果进行了讨论。