• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Edinburgh Handedness Inventory scores: Caucasian and American Indian college students.

作者信息

Dingman S M, Mroczka M A

机构信息

Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Apr;78(2):675-80. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.675.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.675
PMID:8022697
Abstract

Laterality Quotients for 80 American Indian college students were less right-biased than those for 80 Caucasian college students on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Oldfield's 1971 empirically derived deciles for the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory were used to assign decile levels to the data. Deciles were then used to assign data to one of three proposed handedness phenotype classifications. Phenotype classifications were based on Annett's 1985 proposed distribution for a single gene theorized to underlie human handedness. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit analysis showed that the data for Caucasian college students did not differ significantly from what would be anticipated by Annett's model, but American Indians differed significantly. Results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that frequency distributions for Annett's hypothesized right-shift gene may differ across racial groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
Edinburgh Handedness Inventory scores: Caucasian and American Indian college students.
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Apr;78(2):675-80. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.675.
2
Differences between Caucasians and American Indians on the cognitive laterality battery.高加索人与美洲印第安人在认知偏侧性测试组上的差异。
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Jul;34(7):647-60. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00154-9.
3
Lateral preference and schizotypy revisited: comparison of handedness measurement and classification methods.重新探讨利手偏向和精神分裂症特质:惯用手测量和分类方法的比较。
Laterality. 2012;17(2):150-68. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2010.546798. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
4
Familial handedness and spatial ability: a study with Chinese students aged 14-24.家族用手习惯与空间能力:一项针对14至24岁中国学生的研究。
Brain Cogn. 2003 Apr;51(3):375-84. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00041-1.
5
An evaluation of the Briggs-Nebes modified version of Annett's handedness inventory.对安妮特利手性量表的布里格斯 - 内贝斯修改版的评估。
Cortex. 1979 Dec;15(4):683-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80057-x.
6
Estimation of heritability for varied indexes of handedness.不同利手指标的遗传力估计。
Laterality. 2015;20(4):469-82. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.1000920. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
The cross-cultural nature of the relationship between schizotypy and mixed-handedness.精神分裂症特质与混合利手之间关系的跨文化性质。
Laterality. 2013;18(4):476-90. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2012.720985. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
8
Handedness and sexual orientation.利手与性取向。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Oct;16(5):702-12. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402683.
9
Patterns of hand preference in a student population.学生群体中的用手偏好模式。
Cortex. 1975 Sep;11(3):230-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(75)80005-0.
10
On the futility of using familial sinistrality to subclassify handedness groups.
Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):153-5. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80081-0.