Koopman M M, van Beek E J, ten Cate J W
Centre for Hemostasis, Thrombosis, Atherosclerosis, and Inflammation Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1994 Jul-Aug;37(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(05)80047-7.
In this chapter, various tests have been discussed in the diagnosis of DVT and have been classified according to various patient categories. To summarize, the following guidelines may be of clinical use in the management of patients with suspected DVT. Acute, First Event of Suspected DVT These patients often suffer from occluding, proximal thrombi. Therefore, noninvasive tests such as CUS or IPG are most suitable for these patients. If an abnormal CUS or IPG result is found, the diagnosis is virtually proven, and this may serve as a basis to treat the patient with anticoagulants. If a normal CUS or IPG result is obtained, serial testing is indicated to detect extending calf vein thrombi or nonoccluding DVT, which becomes occlusive at follow up. Anticoagulants may be withheld safely if the test remains normal within 1 week. Acute, Recurrent Suspected DVT These patients may have residual thrombi present, which makes the noninvasive tests (CUS/IPG) less useful. However, if a normal noninvasive test was documented previous to the acute recurrent event, this test may be used. If an abnormal test result is found in the presence of a documented, normal previous-test outcome, this may serve as a basis for anticoagulant therapy. Although no formal studies have been performed to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulants if a normal CUS or IPG result is obtained, serial testing is likely to be adequate in these circumstances. Phlebography is the only truly evaluated approach, and this could be considered in all suspected recurrent DVT. Furthermore, contrast venography is the test of choice to discern acute from old thrombi. Asymptomatic DVT in High-Risk Patients The majority of these thrombi are mostly localized in the calf veins only and are often nonocclusive. This makes noninvasive tests unreliable for their detection. Therefore, only contrast venography should be used in this patient category.
在本章中,已经讨论了深静脉血栓形成(DVT)诊断中的各种检查,并根据不同患者类别进行了分类。总结如下,以下指南可能对疑似DVT患者的管理具有临床应用价值。急性、疑似DVT首次发作 这些患者常患有阻塞性近端血栓。因此,超声检查(CUS)或阻抗体积描记法(IPG)等非侵入性检查最适合这些患者。如果CUS或IPG结果异常,诊断几乎可以确立,这可作为使用抗凝剂治疗患者的依据。如果CUS或IPG结果正常,则需进行系列检查以检测小腿静脉血栓扩展或非阻塞性DVT,后者在随访时可能会变为阻塞性。如果检查在1周内仍保持正常,则可安全停用抗凝剂。急性、复发性疑似DVT 这些患者可能存在残留血栓,这使得非侵入性检查(CUS/IPG)的作用较小。然而,如果在急性复发事件之前记录了正常的非侵入性检查结果,则可以使用该检查。如果在记录的先前检查结果正常的情况下发现检查结果异常,则可作为抗凝治疗的依据。虽然尚未进行正式研究来评估如果CUS或IPG结果正常而停用抗凝剂的安全性,但在这些情况下系列检查可能就足够了。静脉造影是唯一经过真正评估的方法,所有疑似复发性DVT均可考虑使用。此外,对比静脉造影是区分急性血栓和陈旧血栓的首选检查。高危患者无症状DVT 这些血栓大多仅局限于小腿静脉,且通常为非阻塞性。这使得非侵入性检查对其检测不可靠。因此,这类患者仅应使用对比静脉造影。