Xie B, Heald S C, Bashir Y, Katritsis D, Murgatroyd F D, Camm A J, Rowland E, Ward D E
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 15;74(2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90090-6.
A new algorithm (St. George's algorithm), based on the polarity and morphology of QRS complexes rather than delta waves, was developed for localizing accessory pathways to 1 of 9 sites on the atrioventricular annuli. This was compared with algorithms previously proposed by Skeberis et al (localizing to 1 of 7 sites) and Milstein et al (localizing to 1 of 4 sites). The preexcited 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded during sinus rhythm in 106 consecutive patients (including 60 retrospectively analyzed patients and 46 prospectively analyzed patients) who underwent successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of a single accessory pathway were analyzed by 3 blinded observers using all 3 algorithms. The results were compared with the actual localization of accessory pathways as derived from endocardial mapping during catheter ablation. In all 106 patients, the accuracy of the 3 algorithms for 4 sites on the atrioventricular annuli (as considered by Milstein's method) was 72%, 79%, and 92% for Milstein's, Skeberis', and St. George's algorithms, respectively. For 7 sites (as considered by Skeberis' method), the accuracy was 65% (Skeberis' algorithm) and 88% (St. George's algorithm), and for 9 sites (as considered by our method) the accuracy was 86% (St. George's algorithm). In 46 prospectively analyzed patients, the accuracy of the 3 algorithms for 4 sites was 70% (Milstein's), 67% (Skeberis'), and 87% (St. George's); for 7 sites the accuracy was 61% (Skeberis') and 85% (St. George's), and for 9 sites the accuracy was 85% (St. George's). The reproducibility of St. George's and Skeberis' methods was better than that of Milstein's method.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一种基于QRS波群极性和形态而非δ波的新算法(圣乔治算法)被开发出来,用于将旁路定位到房室环的9个部位之一。将其与Skeberis等人先前提出的算法(定位到7个部位之一)和Milstein等人提出的算法(定位到4个部位之一)进行比较。3名不知情的观察者使用这3种算法,对106例连续成功进行单旁路射频导管消融的患者(包括60例回顾性分析患者和46例前瞻性分析患者)在窦性心律时记录的预激12导联心电图进行分析。将结果与导管消融期间心内膜标测得出的旁路实际定位进行比较。在所有106例患者中,对于房室环上4个部位(按照Milstein方法),Milstein算法、Skeberis算法和圣乔治算法的准确率分别为72%、79%和92%。对于7个部位(按照Skeberis方法),准确率分别为65%(Skeberis算法)和88%(圣乔治算法),对于9个部位(按照我们的方法),准确率为86%(圣乔治算法)。在46例前瞻性分析患者中,对于4个部位,这3种算法的准确率分别为70%(Milstein算法)、67%(Skeberis算法)和87%(圣乔治算法);对于7个部位,准确率分别为61%(Skeberis算法)和85%(圣乔治算法),对于9个部位,准确率为85%(圣乔治算法)。圣乔治算法和Skeberis算法的可重复性优于Milstein算法。(摘要截断于250字)