Conklin D J, Olson K R
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
Am J Physiol. 1994 Jun;266(6 Pt 2):R1856-60. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.6.R1856.
The effects of salmonid angiotensin II ([Asn1,Val5]ANG II) were examined in isolated trout arteries [celiacomesenteric (CMA), coronary (COA), 3rd or 4th gill arch epibranchial (EBA), ventral aorta (VA)] and veins [anterior cardinal (ACV) and ductus Cuvier strips (DOC)]. ANG II (10(-10)-10(-6) M) produced modest (< 50% other agonists) transient contractions in otherwise unstimulated COA but was a poor agonist in other vessels. In precontracted vessels, ANG II responses were triphasic; transient contraction (P1), relaxation (P2), and partial recovery (P3) and vessel specific. P1 was similar to uncontracted vessels. With 10(-6) MANG II, %P2 was: EBA, 60.3 +/- 8.3% (n = 22); CMA, 48.8 +/- 8.8% (n = 4); ACV, 38.8 +/- 5.3% (n = 29); VA, 29.4 +/- 4.9% (n = 8); DOC, 25.5 +/- 2.4% (n = 14); COA, 13.2 +/- 6.7% (n = 4). P2 in EBA and ACV was dose dependent [EBA vs. ACV: mean effective concentration (EC50) = 3.6 x 10(-9) +/- 8.1 x 10(-10) M, n = 7 vs. 6.2 x 10(-8) +/- 2.3 x 10(-8) M, n = 8, respectively; P < or = 0.05] and inhibited by indomethacin but unaffected by propranolol, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, saralasin, PD-123177, or DuP-753. Removal of EBA endothelium also inhibited relaxation. By comparison, ANG II did not relax bullfrog arteries (dorsal aorta, systemic arch, CMA) or femoral veins. These results show that, in large vessels of trout, the predominant effect of ANG II is an endothelium-dependent, prostanoid-mediated relaxation that is unaffected by classical ANG II-receptor antagonists.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在离体的虹鳟动脉[腹腔肠系膜动脉(CMA)、冠状动脉(COA)、第3或第4鳃弓鳃上动脉(EBA)、腹主动脉(VA)]和静脉[前主静脉(ACV)和居维叶氏管条带(DOC)]中研究了鲑鱼血管紧张素II([天冬酰胺1,缬氨酸5]血管紧张素II)的作用。血管紧张素II(10^(-10)-10^(-6) M)在未受刺激的COA中引起适度(<其他激动剂的50%)的短暂收缩,但在其他血管中是一种较弱的激动剂。在预收缩的血管中,血管紧张素II的反应呈三相;短暂收缩(P1)、舒张(P2)和部分恢复(P3),且具有血管特异性。P1与未收缩的血管相似。使用10^(-6) M血管紧张素II时,P2的百分比为:EBA,60.3±8.3%(n = 22);CMA,48.8±8.8%(n = 4);ACV,38.8±5.3%(n = 29);VA,29.4±4.9%(n = 8);DOC,25.5±2.4%(n = 14);COA,13.2±6.7%(n = 4)。EBA和ACV中的P2呈剂量依赖性[EBA与ACV:平均有效浓度(EC50)分别为3.6×10^(-9)±8.1×10^(-10) M,n = 7与6.2×10^(-8)±2.3×10^(-8) M,n = 8;P≤0.05],且被吲哚美辛抑制,但不受普萘洛尔、N-单甲基-L-精氨酸、沙拉新、PD-123177或杜普-753影响。去除EBA内皮也会抑制舒张。相比之下,血管紧张素II不会使牛蛙动脉(背主动脉、体动脉弓、CMA)或股静脉舒张。这些结果表明,在虹鳟的大血管中,血管紧张素II的主要作用是一种内皮依赖性、前列腺素介导的舒张,不受经典血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的影响。(摘要截断于250字)