Coon J S, Paxton H, Lucy L, Homburger H
Department of Pathology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1994 Jul;118(7):681-5.
The results of the DNA Analysis Module of the College of American Pathologists' Flow Cytometry Survey were analyzed to determine if participating laboratories could correctly identify aneuploid populations and estimate S-phase fraction reproducibly in proficiency specimens. Each survey contained three specimens: a diploid calibrator and two unknowns comprising cultured aneuploid tumor cells with DNA indexes of 1.2 to 2.0 admixed with normal lymphocytes. Results of ploidy analysis were obtained from a mean of 241 participants on 19 unknowns from 1990 to 1992. Most laboratories correctly reported the modal (and intended) number of aneuploid peaks; the proportion of correct responses ranged from 58% to 97%, with a mean of 86%. The lower percents of correct response were associated with near-diploid and tetraploid unknowns. Some laboratories showed consistent deviations from the mean for DNA index, indicating apparent instrument linearity problems. S-phase results on five specimens showed wide interlaboratory variability, although the means of participants' responses were close to the reference values obtained by the specimen provider.
对美国病理学家学会流式细胞术调查中DNA分析模块的结果进行了分析,以确定参与实验室是否能够在能力验证样本中正确识别非整倍体群体并可重复地估计S期分数。每次调查包含三个样本:一个二倍体校准物和两个未知样本,其中未知样本包含DNA指数在1.2至2.0之间的培养非整倍体肿瘤细胞,并与正常淋巴细胞混合。1990年至1992年期间,从241名参与者对19个未知样本的分析中获得了倍性分析结果。大多数实验室正确报告了非整倍体峰的众数(以及预期的)数量;正确回答的比例在58%至97%之间,平均为86%。较低的正确回答百分比与近二倍体和四倍体未知样本相关。一些实验室在DNA指数方面显示出与平均值的一致偏差,表明存在明显的仪器线性问题。五个样本的S期结果显示实验室间差异很大,尽管参与者回答的平均值接近样本提供者获得的参考值。