Suppr超能文献

[面肌痉挛的神经生理学研究——面部肌肉的F波]

[Neurophysiological study of hemifacial spasm--F wave of the facial muscles].

作者信息

Ishikawa M, Ohira T, Namiki J, Takase M, Toya S

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

No To Shinkei. 1994 Apr;46(4):360-5.

PMID:8024835
Abstract

We studied the F wave of the facial muscles on both the normal side and the spastic side in 14 patients with hemifacial spasm. The purpose of this study was to determine if the mechanism of hemifacials spasm originates in ephaptic transmission in the facial nerve at the site of vascular compression or in a hyperexcited facial motor nucleus. Larger amplitude, longer duration and shorter latency F waves in the peripheral nerves than in normals indicate anterior horn cell hyperexcitability. We found abnormal potentials exhibiting synkinesis (lateral spread), a typical electrophysiological finding in hemifacial spasm, in the facial nerve evoked electromyograms of the 14 patients, none of whom had experienced facial palsy or facial nerve block. Electrical stimulation was delivered transcutaneously to the most distal portion of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. Using surface electrodes the F waves were obtained over the mentalis muscle as the second response after the M wave. While the F waves were normal on the patients' normal side, on the spastic side, their duration was longer (mean duration about 1.9 times that of the normal side), their onset latency was slightly shorter, and their F/M amplitude latency was greater than on the normal side. After microvascular decompression, the facial spasm and abnormal F-wave findings resolved. Onset latency was not increased, and on the spastic side some patients displayed facial spasm clinically and electrophysiologically for one year after MVD. In other words, there was hardly any focal demyelination of the facial nerve, so it is possible that ephaptic transmission and ectopic excitation are the mechanism of HFS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们对14例面肌痉挛患者患侧和健侧的面部肌肉F波进行了研究。本研究的目的是确定面肌痉挛的机制是源于面神经在血管压迫部位的ephaptic传导,还是源于面运动核的过度兴奋。与正常人相比,周围神经中F波的波幅更大、持续时间更长、潜伏期更短,提示前角细胞兴奋性增高。我们在14例患者的面神经诱发肌电图中发现了表现为联带运动(侧向扩散)的异常电位,这是面肌痉挛典型的电生理表现,这些患者均未经历过面瘫或面神经阻滞。经皮向面神经下颌缘支的最远端进行电刺激。使用表面电极在颏肌上记录F波,作为继M波之后的第二个反应。患者健侧的F波正常,而患侧的F波持续时间更长(平均持续时间约为健侧的1.9倍),起始潜伏期稍短,F/M波幅潜伏期大于健侧。微血管减压术后,面部痉挛和异常F波表现消失。起始潜伏期未增加,在微血管减压术后,患侧一些患者在临床和电生理上仍表现为面部痉挛达一年。换句话说,面神经几乎没有局灶性脱髓鞘,因此ephaptic传导和异位兴奋可能是面肌痉挛的机制。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验