• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕尔马兹-沙茨冠状动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率的系列间差异:人口统计学和术后管腔直径的差异。

Inter-series differences in the restenosis rate of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent placement: differences in demographics and post-procedure lumen diameter.

作者信息

Carrozza J P, Kuntz R K, Schatz R A, Leon M, Goldberg S, Savage M, Fischman D, Senerchia C, Diver D J, Baim D S

机构信息

Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.

出版信息

Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994 Mar;31(3):173-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810310303.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.1810310303
PMID:8025932
Abstract

Restenosis rates following Palmaz-Schatz stenting vary between 13 and 36%. To determine whether the nearly three-fold interseries difference in restenosis rates reflects systematic factors (demographic and procedural variables such as post-treatment lumen diameter) rather than random variation, we pooled 486 lesions treated with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent in the U.S. Multicenter Registry (n = 259) with the single-center Beth Israel Hospital experience (n = 227) and analyzed the combined series using a continuous geometric model of restenosis. A greater proportion of lesions (66 vs. 50%; P < 0.001) in the Multicenter cohort represented restenosis after a prior intervention. The Multicenter experience also showed a smaller minimum lumen diameter following stent placement (2.61 vs. 3.43 mm; P < 0.001), higher post-stent percent stenosis (16 vs. -2%; P < 0.001), and less acute gain (1.79 vs. 2.67 mm; P < 0.001) than lesions treated in the Beth Israel cohort. At 6-month follow-up, the angiographic restenosis rate (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) was significantly higher in the Multicenter group (35 vs. 27%; P = 0.05), despite the development of less absolute late loss (0.96 vs. 1.32 mm; P < 0.001). Multivariable modeling, however, showed that the only independent predictors of restenosis were a post-procedure lumen diameter < 2.80 mm (odds ratio = 1.57; P = 0.04), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio = 3.55; P < 0.001), and prior restenosis (odds ratio = 1.84; P = 0.008).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

Palmaz-Schatz支架置入术后的再狭窄率在13%至36%之间。为了确定再狭窄率近三倍的系列间差异反映的是系统性因素(人口统计学和手术变量,如治疗后管腔直径)而非随机变异,我们将美国多中心注册研究(n = 259)中486例接受Palmaz-Schatz冠状动脉支架治疗的病变与贝斯以色列医院单中心经验(n = 227)进行汇总,并使用再狭窄的连续几何模型分析合并后的系列。多中心队列中更大比例的病变(66%对50%;P < 0.001)代表先前干预后的再狭窄。与贝斯以色列队列中治疗的病变相比,多中心经验还显示支架置入后最小管腔直径更小(2.61对3.43 mm;P < 0.001),支架后置入狭窄百分比更高(16%对 -2%;P < 0.001),急性增益更小(1.79对2.67 mm;P < 0.001)。在6个月随访时,多中心组的血管造影再狭窄率(直径狭窄≥50%)显著更高(35%对27%;P = 0.05),尽管绝对晚期丢失更少(0.96对1.32 mm;P < 0.001)。然而,多变量建模显示,再狭窄的唯一独立预测因素是术后管腔直径<2.80 mm(优势比 = 1.57;P = 0.04)、糖尿病(优势比 = 3.55;P < 0.001)和先前再狭窄(优势比 = 1.84;P = 0.008)。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Inter-series differences in the restenosis rate of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent placement: differences in demographics and post-procedure lumen diameter.帕尔马兹-沙茨冠状动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率的系列间差异:人口统计学和术后管腔直径的差异。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994 Mar;31(3):173-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810310303.
2
Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty.Palmaz-Schatz支架植入术后的系列血管造影随访:与传统球囊血管成形术的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1557-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90368-b.
3
Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents--quantitative angiographic assessment.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄和再扩张的机制——定量血管造影评估
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90241-r.
4
Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械再狭窄倾向的差异。球囊血管成形术、定向旋切术、支架植入术和准分子激光血管成形术的定量血管造影比较。CARPORT、MERCATOR、MARCATOR、PARK和BENESTENT试验组。
Eur Heart J. 1995 Oct;16(10):1331-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060740.
5
Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jan;21(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90712-a.
6
Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience.冠状动脉内支架置入术的血管造影及临床结果:来自一个大型单中心经验的即刻和长期结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Aug;20(2):328-37. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90098-8.
7
Restenosis after arterial injury caused by coronary stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者冠状动脉支架置入术后动脉损伤引起的再狭窄。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Mar 1;118(5):344-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-5-199303010-00004.
8
Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jan;31(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00438-5.
9
Long-term angiographic results of stenting in chronic total occlusions: influence of stent design and vessel size.慢性完全闭塞病变支架置入的长期血管造影结果:支架设计和血管大小的影响。
Am Heart J. 1999 Oct;138(4 Pt 1):675-88. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70182-1.
10
Immediate results and late outcomes after stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: the multicenter U.S. Palmaz-Schatz stent experience. The Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group.隐静脉移植血管病变支架植入术后的即刻结果和远期预后:美国多中心Palmaz-Schatz支架经验。Palmaz-Schatz支架研究组
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Sep;26(3):704-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00217-r.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of angiography-guided stent placement in small native coronary arteries of < 3.0 mm in diameter.血管造影引导下在直径<3.0毫米的小冠状动脉原位置入支架的安全性和有效性。
Clin Cardiol. 1997 Aug;20(8):711-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200809.