Natvig K, Søberg R
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
Head Neck. 1994 May-Jun;16(3):213-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880160302.
Intraoperative rupture of the capsule of a pleomorphic adenoma is reported to be associated with an increased recurrence rate. For many years, we have noted few recurrences among patients who experienced rupture of the capsule during surgery. Therefore, we asked "How often has surgical rupture of the capsule of a mixed parotid tumor resulted in recurrence among our patients?" This study is a summary of our clinical observations and not a methodologic one.
The medical records of 346 patients operated on between 1965 and 1981 were reviewed. The surgical notes and histopathologic descriptions were examined with special reference to the relationship between surgical margins and tumor capsule. Satisfactory follow-up was obtained from 238 patients primarily operated on in our department. The average observation time was 18 years. None of our patients received postoperative irradiation.
Six (2.5%) patients had a recurrence 7 to 18 years postoperatively (mean 11.8 years). This recurrence rate is of the same order of magnitude as other reports. Rupture of the capsule with macroscopic spillage of tumor cells occurred in 26 patients and two (8%) of them developed recurrent tumors. Surgical dissection close to the capsule was performed in 87 cases, with one recurrence. In the remaining 121 patients the surgical dissections were done without visualizing the tumor capsule. Three (2.5%) of these cases developed recurrent tumor. The 8% recurrence rate after capsule rupture is not statistically different from the 2% for the other patients. There was also no difference in recurrence rate between patients with microscopic positive or negative surgical resection margins.
We question whether spillage of tumor cells from a pleomorphic adenoma plays such an important role in the development of recurrent tumors as has been previously postulated. We also question the justification and benefit of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with this benign disease.
据报道,多形性腺瘤术中包膜破裂与复发率增加有关。多年来,我们注意到在手术中包膜破裂的患者中很少有复发情况。因此,我们提出疑问:“在我们的患者中,腮腺混合瘤包膜手术破裂导致复发的频率有多高?”本研究是我们临床观察的总结,而非方法学研究。
回顾了1965年至1981年间接受手术的346例患者的病历。检查手术记录和组织病理学描述,特别关注手术切缘与肿瘤包膜的关系。对主要在我科接受首次手术的238例患者进行了满意的随访。平均观察时间为18年。我们的患者均未接受术后放疗。
6例(2.5%)患者在术后7至18年(平均11.8年)出现复发。该复发率与其他报道处于同一数量级。26例患者出现包膜破裂并有肿瘤细胞肉眼溢出,其中2例(8%)发生了复发性肿瘤。87例手术紧贴包膜进行,1例复发。其余121例患者手术时未见到肿瘤包膜。其中3例(2.5%)发生了复发性肿瘤。包膜破裂后的复发率8%与其他患者的2%无统计学差异。手术切缘镜下阳性或阴性的患者复发率也无差异。
我们质疑多形性腺瘤肿瘤细胞溢出在复发性肿瘤发生中是否如先前假设的那样起重要作用。我们也质疑对这种良性疾病患者进行术后放疗的合理性和益处。