Beard D J, Dodd C A, Trundle H R, Simpson A H
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, England.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Jul;76(4):654-9.
We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of two regimes of rehabilitation for knees with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD). Fifty ACLD patients were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: a programme of muscle strengthening (T) or a programme designed to enhance proprioception and improve hamstring contraction reflexes (P). An indirect measure of proprioception, the reflex hamstring contraction latency (RHCL), and a functional scoring system were used to record the status of the knee before and after the 12-week course of physiotherapy. Sagittal knee laxity was also measured. There was improvement in mean RHCL and in the mean functional score in both groups after treatment. The improvement in group P was significantly greater than that in group T. There was no significant change in joint laxity after treatment in either group. In both groups there was a positive correlation between improvement in RHCL and functional gain.
我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验,以研究两种康复方案对前交叉韧带损伤(ACLD)膝关节的疗效。50例ACLD患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一:肌肉强化训练方案(T组)或旨在增强本体感觉并改善绳肌收缩反射的方案(P组)。采用间接本体感觉测量指标——绳肌反射收缩潜伏期(RHCL)和功能评分系统,记录12周物理治疗前后膝关节的状况。同时测量膝关节矢状面松弛度。治疗后两组的平均RHCL和平均功能评分均有所改善。P组的改善明显大于T组。两组治疗后关节松弛度均无显著变化。两组中,RHCL的改善与功能改善之间均呈正相关。